Challenges in making standardisation work in healthcare: lessons from a qualitative interview study of a line-labelling policy in a UK region

Author:

Kriznik Natasha MarieORCID,Lamé GuillaumeORCID,Dixon-Woods Mary

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify and learn from efforts to design and implement a standardised policy for labelling of invasive tubing and lines across a regional health system.DesignSingle case study involving qualitative interviews and documentary analysis.SettingA devolved health system in the UK National Health Service (NHS).ParticipantsNHS staff (n=10) and policy-makers (n=8) who were involved in the design and/or implementation of the standardised policy.ResultsThough standardising labelling of invasive tubing and lines was initially seen as a common-sense technical change, challenges during the process of developing and implementing the policy were multiple and sociotechnical in nature. Major challenges related to defining the problem and the solution, limited sustained engagement with stakeholders and users, prototyping/piloting of the solution, and planning for implementation. Some frontline staff remained unconvinced of the need for or value of the policy, since they either did not believe that there was a problem or did not agree that standardised labelling was the right solution. Mundane practical issues such authorisation and resourcing, supply chains for labels, the need to restructure work practices to accommodate the new standard, and the physical features of the labels in specific clinical settings all had important impacts.ConclusionsNewly standardised tools and practices have to fit within a system of pre-existing norms, practices and procedures. We identified a number of practical, social and cultural challenges when designing and implementing a standardised policy in a regional healthcare system. Taking account of both sociocultural and technical aspects of standardisation, combined with systems thinking, could lead to more effective implementation and increase acceptability and usability of new standards.

Funder

The Health Foundation's grant to Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Standardisation and its discontents;Wears;Cogn Technol Work,2015

2. ISO, IEC . Standardization and related activities — general vocabulary. 76. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization / Internationa Electrotechnical Commission, 2004.

3. Spath PL . Reducing errors through work system improvements. In: Error reduction in health care: a systems approach to improving patient safety. 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2011: 217–44.

4. Implementing a standard internal telephone number 2222 for cardiac arrest calls in all hospitals in Europe;Whitaker;Resuscitation,2017

5. Standardization as a mechanism to improve safety in health care;Rozich;Jt Comm J Qual Saf,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3