What is multidisciplinary cancer care like in practice? a protocol for a mixed-method study to characterise ambulatory oncology services in the Australian public sector

Author:

Nic Giolla Easpaig BrónaORCID,Arnolda Gaston,Tran Yvonne,Bierbaum MiaORCID,Lamprell Klay,Delaney Geoffrey P,Liauw Winston,Chittajallu Renuka,Winata Teresa,Ward Robyn L,Currow David C,Olver Ian,Karnon Jonathan,Westbrook Johanna,Braithwaite JeffreyORCID

Abstract

IntroductionAn understanding of the real-world provision of oncology outpatient services can help maintain service quality in the face of escalating demand and tight budgets, by informing the design of interventions that improve the effectiveness or efficiency of provision. The aims of this study are threefold. First, to develop an understanding of cancer services in outpatient clinics by characterising the organisation and practice of multidisciplinary care (MDC). Second, to explore the key areas of: (a) clinical decision-making and (b) engagement with patients’ supportive needs. Third, to identify barriers to, and facilitators of, the delivery of quality care in these settings.Methods and analysisA suite of mixed-methods studies will be implemented at six hospitals providing cancer outpatient clinics, with a staged roll-out. In Stage One, we will examine policies, use unstructured observations and undertake interviews with key health professionals to characterise the organisation and delivery of MDC. In Stage Two, observations of practice will continue, to deepen our understanding, and to inform two focused studies. The first will explore decision-making practices and the second will examine how staff engage with patients’ needs; both studies involve interviews, to complement observation. As part of the study of supportive care, we will examine the implications of an introduction of patient-reported measures (PRMs) into care, adding surveys to interviews before and after PRMs roll-out. Data analysis will account for site-specific and cross-site issues using an adapted Qualitative Rapid Appraisal, Rigorous Analysis approach. Quantitative data from clinician surveys will be statistically analysed and triangulated with the related qualitative study findings.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was granted by South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (no. 18/207). Findings will be shared with participating hospitals and widely disseminated through publications and presentations.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference65 articles.

1. Global cancer statistics

2. International Agency for Research on Cancer . GLOBOCAN 2018 global cancer Observatory, 2018. Available: https://gco.iarc.fr/ [Accessed 4 Jul 2019].

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Cancer incidence projections, Australia 2011 to 2020. Canberra, Australia: AIHW, 2012.

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Cancer in Australia. Canberra, Australia: AIHW, 2017.

5. Cancer Australia . All about multidisciplinary care. Available: https://canceraustralia.gov.au/clinical-best-practice/multidisciplinary-care/all-about-multidisciplinary-care [Accessed 20 Jul 2018].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3