Secondhand smoke exposure and support for smoke-free policies in cities and rural areas of China from 2009 to 2015: a population-based cohort study (the ITC China Survey)

Author:

Sansone GenevieveORCID,Fong Geoffrey T,Yan Mi,Meng Gang,Craig Lorraine,Xu Steve S,Quah Anne C K,Wu Changbao,Feng Guoze,Jiang Yuan

Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine trends in smoking prevalence in key venues (workplaces, restaurants, bars) and in public support for comprehensive smoke-free laws, with comparisons between cities and rural areas in China.DesignData are from Waves 3–5 (2009–2015) of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey, a cohort survey of smokers and non-smokers. Logistic regression analyses employing generalised estimating equations assessed changes in smoking prevalence and support for smoke-free laws over time; specific tests assessed whether partial smoking bans implemented in three cities between Waves 3 and 4 had greater impact.SettingFace-to-face surveys were conducted in seven cities (Beijing, Changsha, Guangzhou, Kunming, Shanghai, Shenyang and Yinchuan) and five rural areas (Changzhi, Huzhou, Tongren, Yichun and Xining).ParticipantsIn each survey location at each wave, a representative sample of approximately 800 smokers and 200 non-smokers (aged 18+) were selected using a multistage cluster sampling design.Main outcome measuresPrevalence of smoking (whether respondents noticed smoking inside restaurants, bars and workplaces); smoking rules inside these venues; and support for complete smoking bans in these venues.ResultsAlthough smoking prevalence decreased and support increased over time, neither trend was greater in cities that implemented partial smoke-free laws. Smoking was higher in rural than urban workplaces (62% vs 44%, p<0.01), but was equally high in all restaurants and bars. There were generally no differences in secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure between smokers and non-smokers except in rural workplaces (74% vs 58%, p<0.05). Support for comprehensive bans was equally high across locations.ConclusionsPartial laws have had no effect on reducing SHS in China. There is an urgent need for comprehensive smoke-free laws to protect the public from exposure to deadly tobacco smoke in both urban and rural areas. The high support among Chinese smokers for such a law demonstrates that public support is not a barrier for action.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

National Cancer Institute

Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference44 articles.

1. World Health Organization . ITC project. Smoke-free policies in China, evidence of effectiveness and implications for action, October 2015. Geneva, 2015.

2. World Health Organization . The Bill China Cannot Afford: Health, Economic and Social Costs of China’s Tobacco Epidemic. Manila, Philippines, 2017.

3. Drope J , Schluger N , Cahn Z , et al . The tobacco atlas. 6th edn. Atlanta: American Cancer Society and Vital Strategies, 2018.

4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) . IARC handbooks of cancer prevention in tobacco control: evaluating the effectiveness of smoke-free policies. 13. Lyon, France: IARC, 2009.

5. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids . Smoke-free laws encourage smokers to quit and discourage youth from starting, 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3