Abstract
ObjectiveTo test the effectiveness of the Safe at Home programme which was developed to improve family well-being and prevent multiple forms of violence in the home.DesignWaitlisted pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.SettingNorth Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.Participants202 heterosexual couples.InterventionThe Safe at Home programme.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was family functioning, with secondary outcomes of past-3 month co-occurring violence, intimate partner violence (IPV) and harsh discipline. Pathway mechanisms assessed included attitudes related to acceptance of harsh discipline, gender equitable attitudes, positive parenting skills and power sharing within the couple.ResultsNo significant improvements in family functioning were documented for women (β=1.49; 95% CI: −2.75 to 5.74; p=0.49) and men (β=1.09; 95% CI: −3.13 to 4.74; p=0.69). However, women in Safe at Home reported a OR=0.15 (p=0.000), OR=0.23 (p=0.001) and OR=0.29 (p=0.013) change in co-occurring IPV and harsh discipline; physical/sexual/emotional IPV by their partner and use of physical and/or emotional harsh discipline against their child, respectively, as compared with women in the waitlisted group. Men participating in Safe at Home reported a OR=0.23 (p=0.005) change in perpetration of co-occurring violence, OR=0.26 (p=0.003) change in any form of IPV perpetration and OR=0.56 (p=0.19) change in use of harsh discipline against their child as compared with the waitlist arm. Positive changes were also noted in pathway variables around attitudes, skills and behaviours within couples.ConclusionThis pilot trial demonstrated the Safe at Home programme to be highly effective in preventing multiple forms of violence in the home and improving equitable attitudes and skills in couples. Future research should assess longitudinal impact and implementation at scale.Trial registration numberNCT04163549.
Funder
United States Agency for International Development
Reference48 articles.
1. World Health Organization, London School of Health and Tropical Medicine, South African Medical Research Council, eds ed. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence World Health Organization; 2013.
2. Hillis S , Mercy J , Amobi A , et al . Global prevalence of past-year violence against children: A. Systematic Review and Minimum Estimates Pediatr Evanst 2016;137:e20154079. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-4079
3. UNICEF . Hidden in plain sight: a statistical analysis of violence against children New York UNICEF; 2014.
4. Understanding the linkages between violence against women and violence against children;Fry;Lancet Glob Health,2017
5. Guedes A , Bott S , Garcia-Moreno C , et al . Bridging the gaps: a global review of intersections of violence against women and violence against children. Glob Health Action 2016;9:31516. doi:10.3402/gha.v9.31516
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献