Abstract
IntroductionWhile there have been several literature reviews on the performance of digital sepsis prediction technologies and clinical decision-support algorithms for adults, there remains a knowledge gap in examining the development of automated technologies for sepsis prediction in children. This scoping review will critically analyse the current evidence on the design and performance of automated digital technologies to predict paediatric sepsis, to advance their development and integration within clinical settings.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will follow Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, conducted between February and December 2022. We will further develop the protocol using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. We plan to search the following databases: Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Google Scholar, Institute of Electric and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Studies will be included on children >90 days postnatal to <21 years old, predicted to have or be at risk of developing sepsis by a digitalised model or algorithm designed for a clinical setting. Two independent reviewers will complete the abstract and full-text screening and the data extraction. Thematic analysis will be used to develop overarching concepts and present the narrative findings with quantitative results and descriptive statistics displayed in data tables.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for this scoping review study of the available literature is not required. We anticipate that the scoping review will identify the current evidence and design characteristics of digital prediction technologies for the timely and accurate prediction of paediatric sepsis and factors influencing clinical integration. We plan to disseminate the preliminary findings from this review at national and international research conferences in global and digital health, gathering critical feedback from multidisciplinary stakeholders.Scoping review registrationhttps://osf.io/veqha/?view_only=f560d4892d7c459ea4cff6dcdfacb086
Reference50 articles.
1. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the global burden of disease study;Rudd;The Lancet,2020
2. Cost of pediatric severe sepsis hospitalizations;Carlton;JAMA Pediatr,2019
3. World Health Organization . Global report on epidemiology and burden of sepsis: current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions [Internet]. Geneva, 2020. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/334216 [Accessed 25 Jan 2022].
4. Pediatric sepsis update: how are children different?;Emr;Surg Infect,2018
5. Antibiotic therapy in neonatal and pediatric septic shock;Aneja;Curr Infect Dis Rep,2011