Abstract
IntroductionHealth inequities are differences in health between groups of people that are avoidable, unfair and unjust. Achieving equitable health outcomes requires approaches that recognise and account for the differences in levels of advantage between groups. Implementation science, which studies how to translate evidence-based interventions into routine practice, is increasingly recognised as an approach to address health inequities by identifying factors and processes that enable equitable implementation of interventions. This article describes the protocol for a scoping review of the literature relating to the equitable implementation of interventions, focusing on ethnicity-related health inequities. The scoping review aims to identify equity-focused implementation science theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) and to synthesise and analyse the evidence relating to the factors that aid or inhibit equitable implementation of health interventions.Methods and analysisThe scoping review is guided by the methodology developed by Arksey and O’Malley and enhanced by Levac and colleagues. Relevant literature will be identified by searching electronic databases, grey literature, hand-searching key journals and searching the reference lists and citations of studies that meet the inclusion criteria. We will focus on literature published from 2011 to the present. Titles, abstracts and full-text articles will be screened independently by two researchers; any disagreements will be resolved through discussion with another researcher. Extracted data will be summarised and analysed to address the scoping review aims.Ethics and disseminationThe scoping review will map the available literature on equity-focused implementation science TMFs and the facilitators and barriers to equitable implementation of interventions. Ethical approval is not required. Dissemination of the results of the review will include publications in peer-review journals and conference and stakeholder presentations. Findings from the review will support those implementing interventions to ensure that the implementation pathway and processes are equitable, thereby improving health outcomes and reducing existing inequities.
Funder
Healthier Lives National Science Challenge
Reference37 articles.
1. The Concepts and Principles of Equity and Health
2. Ministry of Health . Achieving equity in health outcomes: summary of a discovery process. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health, 2019. Available: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/achieving-equity-in-health-outcomes-summary-of-a-discovery-process-30jul2019.pdf
3. World Health Organization . Health equity. 2022. Available: https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-equity#tab=tab_1 [Accessed 3 Aug 2022].
4. Baumann AA , Cabassa LJ . Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:190. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4975-3
5. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care . Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2002: 1.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献