Abstract
IntroductionThe high incidence of unsafe anaesthetic care leads to adverse events and increases the burden on patient safety. An important reason for unsafe anaesthesia care is the lack of non-technical skills (NTS), which are defined as personal cognitive, social or interpersonal skills, among anaesthetists. The anaesthetists’ NTS (ANTS) behavioural marker system has been widely used to evaluate and improve anaesthetists’ behavioural performance to ensure patient safety. This protocol describes a planned systematic review aiming to determine the validity and reliability of the ANTS behavioural marker system and its application as a tool for the training and assessment of ANTS and for improving patient safety.Methods and analysisThis systematic review follows the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Studies that applied the ANTS behavioural marker system in a meaningful way, including using the ANTS behavioural marker system to guide data collection, analysis, coding, measurement, and/or reporting, which have been published in peer-reviewed journals, will be eligible. A citation search strategy will be employed. We will search Scopus and Web of Science for publications from 2002 to May 2022, which cite the three original ANTS behavioural marker system publications by Fletcheret al. We will also search the references of the relevant reviews for additional eligible studies. For each study, two authors will independently screen papers to determine eligibility and will extract the data. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists. A framework analysis approach that consists of five steps—familiarisation, identifying a thematic data extraction framework, indexing, charting, mapping and interpretation—will be used to synthesise and report the data.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this study. The findings will be disseminated primarily through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022297773.
Funder
Jiangsu Province phase VI 333 high level talent training project
Reference30 articles.
1. National Academies of Sciences E, and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Board on Health Care Services, Board on Global Health, Committee on Improving the Quality of Health Care Globally . Crossing the global quality chasm: improving health care worldwide. Washington (DC) The National Academies Press. USA; 2018: 23–52.
2. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis
3. The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review;Schwendimann;BMC Health Serv Res,2018
4. The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies
5. Strengthening the Medical Error "Meme Pool";Mazer;J Gen Intern Med,2019
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献