Accuracy of self-perceived risk of falls among hospitalised adults in China: an observational study

Author:

Bao Guanjun,Liu YuanfeiORCID,Zhang Wei,Luo Ye,Zhu Lin,Jin Jingfen

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of self-perceived risk of falls in hospitalised adults and explore factors associated with the differences.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingWe conducted the study in two tertiary general hospitals located in Zhejiang province and Shandong province in China.Participants339 patients were recruited using convenient sampling. The majority of them were men (54%), aged 61–70 (40.1%) and had received secondary school education or lower (82%).Outcome measuresThe Fall Risk Perception Questionnaire and the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) were used to measure patients’ self-perceived risk of falls and nurses’ assessment. Other risk factors of falls were assessed to identify the determinants of disparities.ResultsMost patients (74.6%) had a high risk of falls according to MFS. Only 61.9% of the patients’ perceived risk matched with the assessment of nurses. Nearly one-third (27.5%) underestimated their fall risk, while the remaining (10.6%) overestimated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that older age, lower number of comorbidities, not having fear of falling and emergency department were the significant factors associated with underestimated risk of falls (p<0.05). Besides, endocrine department and having fall-related injuries were significantly associated with overestimated risk of falls (p<0.05).ConclusionHospitalised patients were proven to be poor at recognising their risk of falls. Measurement of patients’ self-perceived and health professionals’ assessment of fall risk should be conducted to evaluate the disparity. This study provides a solid foundation to raise medical staff’s awareness of the targeted population, identify the underlying factors and implement tailored fall prevention strategies and education.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3