Experiences of ‘traditional’ and ‘one-stop’ MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathways in England: a qualitative study with patients and GPs

Author:

Merriel Samuel William DavidORCID,Archer StephanieORCID,Forster Alice SORCID,Eldred-Evans David,McGrath John,Ahmed Hashim UddinORCID,Hamilton WillieORCID,Walter Fiona MORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aimed to understand and explore patient and general practitioner (GP) experiences of ‘traditional’ and ‘one-stop’ prostate cancer diagnostic pathways in England.DesignQualitative study using semi-structured interviews, analysed using inductive thematic analysisSettingPatients were recruited from National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in London and in Devon; GPs were recruited via National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Networks. Interviews were conducted in person or via telephone.ParticipantsPatients who had undergone a MRI scan of the prostate as part of their diagnostic work-up for possible prostate cancer, and GPs who had referred at least one patient for possible prostate cancer in the preceding 12 months.Results22 patients (aged 47–80 years) and 10 GPs (6 female, aged 38–58 years) were interviewed. Patients described three key themes: cancer beliefs in relation to patient’s attitudes towards prostate cancer;communication with their GP and specialist having a significant impact on experience of the pathway and pathway experience being influenced by appointment and test burden. GP interview themes included: the challenges of dealing with imperfect information in the current pathway; managing uncertainty in identifying patients with possible prostate cancer and sharing this uncertainty with them, and other social, cultural and personal contextual influences.ConclusionsPatients and GPs reported a range of experiences and views of the current prostate cancer diagnostic pathways in England. Patients valued ‘one-stop’ pathways integrating prostate MRI and diagnostic consultations with specialists over the more traditional approach of several hospital appointments. GPs remain uncertain how best to identify patients needing referral for urgent prostate cancer testing due to the lack of accurate triage and risk assessment strategies.

Funder

Cancer Research UK

NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Measuring patient experience of diagnostic care and acceptability of testing;Forster;Diagnosis,2021

2. NICE . Suspected cancer: recognition and referral; 2015: 1–95. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12 [Accessed 13 Oct 2021].

3. Stage at diagnosis and early mortality from cancer in England;McPhail;Br J Cancer,2015

4. Cancer patients’ experiences with urgent referrals to cancer patient pathways;Sandager;Eur J Cancer Care,2019

5. Using linked English cancer registration data to assess variation in diagnostic pathway length;Fraser;Int J Popul Data Sci,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3