Innovative models of healthcare delivery: an umbrella review of reviews

Author:

Roberts NatalieORCID,Carrigan AnnORCID,Clay-Williams RobynORCID,Hibbert Peter DORCID,Mahmoud ZeyadORCID,Pomare ChiaraORCID,Fajardo Pulido Diana,Meulenbroeks Isabelle,Knaggs Gilbert ThomasORCID,Austin Elizabeth EORCID,Churruca KateORCID,Ellis Louise AORCID,Long Janet CORCID,Hutchinson Karen,Best Stephanie,Nic Giolla Easpaig Brona,Sarkies Mitchell NORCID,Francis Auton Emilie,Hatem Sarah,Dammery GenevieveORCID,Nguyen Mai-Tran,Nguyen Hoa MiORCID,Arnolda GastonORCID,Rapport FrancesORCID,Zurynski YvonneORCID,Maka Katherine,Braithwaite JeffreyORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo undertake a synthesis of evidence-based research for seven innovative models of care to inform the development of new hospitals.DesignUmbrella review.SettingInterventions delivered inside and outside of acute care settings.ParticipantsChildren and adults with one or more identified acute or chronic health conditions.Data sourcesPsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE and CINAHL.Primary and secondary outcome measuresClinical indicators and mortality, healthcare utilisation, quality of life, self-management and self-care and patient knowledge.ResultsA total of 66 reviews were included, synthesising evidence from 1272 primary studies across the 7 models of care. Virtual care was the most common model studied, addressed by 47 (73%) of the reviews. Common outcomes evaluated across reviews were clinical indicators and mortality, healthcare utilisation, self-care and self-management, patient knowledge, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. The findings indicate that the innovative models of healthcare we identified in this review may be effective in managing patients with a range of acute and chronic conditions. Most of the included reviews reported evidence of comparable or improved care.ConclusionsA consideration of local infrastructure and individual patient characteristics, such as health literacy, may be critical in determining the suitability of models of care for patients and their implementation in local health systems.Trial registration number10.17605/OSF.IO/PS6ZU.

Funder

Health Infrastructure NSW

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference93 articles.

1. Department of Health . Systemic national challenges in health care: australian government. 2013. Available: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/NPHC-Strategic-Framework~systemic

2. Preparing national health systems to cope with the impending tsunami of ageing and its associated complexities: Towards more sustainable health care

3. Alternative Strategies to Inpatient Hospitalization for Acute Medical Conditions

4. The Australian Digital Health Agency . Framework for action: how australia will deliver the benefits of digitally enabled health and care. 2020. Available: https://conversation.digitalhealth.gov.au/sites/default/files/framework_for_action_-_july_2018.pdf

5. The Mckell Institute . Positive disruption: healthcare, ageing & participation in the age of technology. 2015. Available: https://mckellinstitute.org.au/app/uploads/The-McKell-Institute-Positive-Disruption-September-2015.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3