Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare

Author:

Webb RebeccaORCID,Uddin Nazihah,Constantinou Georgina,Ford ElizabethORCID,Easter AbigailORCID,Shakespeare JudyORCID,Hann Agnes,Roberts Nia,Alderdice Fiona,Sinesi Andrea,Coates Rose,Hogg Sally,Ayers Susan

Abstract

Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are common and can have an adverse impact on women and their families. However, research suggests that a substantial proportion of women with PMH problems do not access care.ObjectivesTo synthesise the results from previous systematic reviews of barriers and facilitators to women to seeking help, accessing help, and engaging in PMH care, and to suggest recommendations for clinical practice and policy.DesignA meta-review of systematic reviews.Review methodsSeven databases were searched and reviewed using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses search strategy. Studies that focused on the views of women seeking help and accessing PMH care were included. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 was used to assess review methodology. To improve validity of results, a qualitative sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess whether themes remained consistent across all reviews, regardless of their quality rating.ResultsA total of 32 reviews were included. A wide range of barriers and facilitators to women accessing PMH care were identified. These mapped across a multilevel model of influential factors (individual, healthcare professional, interpersonal, organisational, political and societal) and across the care pathway (from decision to consult to receiving care). Evidence-based recommendations to support the design and delivery of PMH care were produced based on identified barriers and facilitators.ConclusionThe identified barriers and facilitators point to a complex interplay of many factors, highlighting the need for an international effort to increase awareness of PMH problems, reduce mental health stigma, and provide woman-centred, flexible care, delivered by well trained and culturally sensitive primary care, maternity, and psychiatric health professionals.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019142854.

Funder

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference100 articles.

1. The prevalence of Antenatal and postnatal Co-morbid anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis;Falah-Hassani;Psychol Med,2017

2. Knight M , Bunch K , Tuffnell D , et al . Saving lives, improving mothers’ care: lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2016-18. In: MBRRACE-UK - Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk throught Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK. Oxford, 2020.

3. Maternal and newborn outcomes among women with schizophrenia: a retrospective Population‐Based cohort study;Vigod;BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy,2014

4. British Association for Psychopharmacology consensus guidance on the use of psychotropic medication preconception, in pregnancy and postpartum 2017

5. Rusner M , Berg M , Begley C . Bipolar disorder in pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review of outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:331. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1127-1

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3