Exploring the views of low-acuity emergency department consulters on an educational intervention and general practitioner appointment service: a qualitative study in Berlin, Germany

Author:

Kümpel LisaORCID,Oslislo Sarah,Resendiz Cantu Rebecca,Möckel MartinORCID,Heintze Christoph,Holzinger FelixORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesLow-acuity patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) frequently have unmet ambulatory care needs. This qualitative study explores the patients’ views of an intervention aimed at education about care options and promoting primary care (PC) attachment.DesignQualitative telephone interviews were conducted with a subsample of participants of an interventional pilot study, based on a semi-structured interview guide. The data were analysed through qualitative content analysis.SettingThe study was carried out in three EDs in the city centre of Berlin, Germany.ParticipantsThirty-two low-acuity ED consulters with no connection to a general practitioner (GP) who had participated in the pilot study were interviewed; (f/m: 15/17; mean age: 32.9 years).InterventionIn the pilot intervention, ED patients with low-acuity complaints were provided with an information leaflet on appropriate ED usage and alternative care paths and they were offered an optional GP appointment scheduling service. Qualitative interviews explored the views of a subsample of the participants on the intervention.ResultsInterviewees perceived both parts of the intervention as valuable. Receiving a leaflet about appropriate ED use and alternatives to the ED was viewed as helpful, with participants expressing the desire for additional online information and a wider distribution of the content. The GP appointment service was positively assessed by the participants who had made use of this offer and seen as potentially helpful in establishing a long-term connection to GP care. The majority of patients declining a scheduled GP appointment expected no personal need for further medical care in the near future or preferred to choose a GP independently.ConclusionsLow-acuity ED patients seem receptive to information on alternative acute care options and prevailingly appreciate measures to encourage and facilitate attachment to a GP. Promoting PC integration could contribute to a change in future usage behaviour.Trial registration numberDRKS00023480.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. International Perspectives on Emergency Department Crowding

2. Morley C , Unwin M , Peterson GM , et al . Emergency department crowding: a systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0203316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203316

3. Patients attending emergency departments;Scherer;Deutsches Ärzteblatt International,2017

4. Boender TS , Greiner F , Kocher T , et al . Inanspruchnahme deutscher Notaufnahmen während der COVID-19-Pandemie – der Notaufnahme-Situationsreport (sitrep). Published Online First June 25, 2020. doi:10.25646/6959

5. Notaufnahme während der Corona Pandemie: weniger Non-Covid-19-Notfälle;Ramshorn-Zimmer;Dtsch Ärztebl,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3