Abstract
ObjectivesLow-acuity patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) frequently have unmet ambulatory care needs. This qualitative study explores the patients’ views of an intervention aimed at education about care options and promoting primary care (PC) attachment.DesignQualitative telephone interviews were conducted with a subsample of participants of an interventional pilot study, based on a semi-structured interview guide. The data were analysed through qualitative content analysis.SettingThe study was carried out in three EDs in the city centre of Berlin, Germany.ParticipantsThirty-two low-acuity ED consulters with no connection to a general practitioner (GP) who had participated in the pilot study were interviewed; (f/m: 15/17; mean age: 32.9 years).InterventionIn the pilot intervention, ED patients with low-acuity complaints were provided with an information leaflet on appropriate ED usage and alternative care paths and they were offered an optional GP appointment scheduling service. Qualitative interviews explored the views of a subsample of the participants on the intervention.ResultsInterviewees perceived both parts of the intervention as valuable. Receiving a leaflet about appropriate ED use and alternatives to the ED was viewed as helpful, with participants expressing the desire for additional online information and a wider distribution of the content. The GP appointment service was positively assessed by the participants who had made use of this offer and seen as potentially helpful in establishing a long-term connection to GP care. The majority of patients declining a scheduled GP appointment expected no personal need for further medical care in the near future or preferred to choose a GP independently.ConclusionsLow-acuity ED patients seem receptive to information on alternative acute care options and prevailingly appreciate measures to encourage and facilitate attachment to a GP. Promoting PC integration could contribute to a change in future usage behaviour.Trial registration numberDRKS00023480.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Reference56 articles.
1. International Perspectives on Emergency Department Crowding
2. Morley C , Unwin M , Peterson GM , et al . Emergency department crowding: a systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0203316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203316
3. Patients attending emergency departments;Scherer;Deutsches Ärzteblatt International,2017
4. Boender TS , Greiner F , Kocher T , et al . Inanspruchnahme deutscher Notaufnahmen während der COVID-19-Pandemie – der Notaufnahme-Situationsreport (sitrep). Published Online First June 25, 2020. doi:10.25646/6959
5. Notaufnahme während der Corona Pandemie: weniger Non-Covid-19-Notfälle;Ramshorn-Zimmer;Dtsch Ärztebl,2020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献