Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years

Author:

Longo FrancescoORCID,Claxton Karl,Lomas JamesORCID,Martin Stephen

Abstract

ObjectivesPublicly funded adult social care (ASC) in England aims to improve quality of life through the provision of services for individuals with care needs due to physical and/or mental impairment or illness. Access to these services, however, is often restricted to contain public expenditure. With a fast-growing care need, information on whether extending eligibility is good value for money becomes policy-relevant.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThis study investigates the effect of extending ASC eligibility on user care-related quality of life (CRQoL), a policy-relevant measure of quality of life.DesignWe use English cross-sectional survey data from 2017/2018 to 2019/2020 on users receiving publicly funded long-term support including domiciliary and other community-based social care, as well as residential and nursing care from local authorities responsible for ASC. We employ the two-stage least square method to estimate the impact of ASC expenditure on CRQoL at various levels of ASC expenditure in each financial year. This includes the CRQoL effect of increasing expenditure from zero to some level, which captures the effect of extending ASC eligibility to new users.ResultsWe find that publicly funded ASC improves the CRQoL of both existing and newly eligible users, although the latter are likely to experience greater CRQoL gains. Moreover, from 2017/2018 to 2019/2020, spending as much as an average user for a newly eligible user costs between £54 224 and £77 778 per social care-quality-adjusted life year (SC-QALY) gained. These results are statistically significant at the 5% level. Compared with this finding, increasing expenditure for an existing user has always a higher cost per SC-QALY gained.ConclusionsExtending ASC eligibility to new users is likely to be more cost-effective compared with using the same resources to increase expenditure for existing users.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Glied S , Smith PC , Fernandez J-L . The oxford handbook of health economics. 2011. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238828.001.0001

2. Bottery S . Social care services: funding cuts are biting hard: the king’s Fund. 2020. Available: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2020/01/social-care-funding-cuts-are-biting-hard

3. Seamer P , Brake S , Moore P , et al . Did government spending cuts to social care for older people lead to an increase in emergency hospital admissions? an ecological study, England 2005–2016. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024577. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024577

4. HM Government . Build Back Better: Our Plan for Health and Social Care. 2021.

5. Appleby J , Hemmings N , Maguire D , et al . Public satisfaction with the NHS and social care in 2019. Results and trends from the British social attitudes survey. London: King’s Fund, 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3