Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study

Author:

Hope CarlaORCID,Lund Jonathan,Griffiths Gareth,Humes David

Abstract

The aim of surgical training across the 10 surgical specialties is to produce competent day 1 consultants. Progression through training in the UK is assessed by the Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP).ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine variation in ARCP outcomes within surgical training and identify differences in outcomes between specialties.DesignA national cohort study using data from the UK Medical Education Database was performed. ARCP outcome was the primary outcome measure. Multilevel ordinal regression analyses were performed, with ARCP outcomes nested within trainees.ParticipantsHigher surgical trainees (ST3–ST8) from nine UK surgical specialties were included (vascular surgery was excluded due to insufficient data). All surgical trainees across the UK with an ARCP outcome between 2010 and 2017 were included.ResultsEight thousand two hundred and twenty trainees with an ARCP outcome awarded between 2010 and 2017 were included, comprising 31 788 ARCP outcomes. There was substantial variation in the proportion of non-standard outcomes recorded across specialties with general surgery trainees having the highest proportion of non-standard outcomes (22.5%) and urology trainees the fewest (12.4%). After adjustment, general surgery trainees were 1.3 times more likely to receive a non-standard ARCP outcome compared with trainees in trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.45, p=0.001). Urology trainees were 36% less likely to receive a non-standard outcome compared with T&O trainees (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.75, p<0.001). Female trainees and older age were associated with non-standard outcomes (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.22, p=0.020; OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.05, p<0.001).ConclusionThere is wide variation in the training outcome assessments across surgical specialties. General surgery has higher rates of non-standard outcomes compared with other surgical specialties. Across all specialties, female sex and older age were associated with non-standard outcomes.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Joint Committee on Surgical Training . The joint Committee on surgical training; about us 2018, 2020. Available: https://www.jcst.org/about-us/ [Accessed 09 Mar 2020].

2. Health Education England . The gold guide, 2018. Available: https://specialtytraining.hee.nhs.uk/

3. Joint Committee on Surgical Training . Certification, 2018. Available: https://www.jcst.org/uk-trainees/str-trainees/certification/ [Accessed 09 Mar 2020].

4. General Medical Council . The Intercollegiate surgical curriculum: educating the surgeons of the future, 2018. Available: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/General_Surgery_inc._Trauma_TIG__approved_Jul_17_.pdf_72509288.pdf [Accessed 27 Dec 2020].

5. General Medical Council . Promoting excellence, 2020. Available: https://www.gmc-uk.org/education/standards-guidance-and-curricula/standards-and-outcomes/promoting-excellence [Accessed 07 Jan 2021].

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3