Understanding the low take-up of home-based dialysis through a shared decision-making lens: a qualitative study

Author:

Noyes JaneORCID,Roberts GarethORCID,Williams Gail,Chess JamesORCID,Mc Laughlin LeahORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore how people with chronic kidney disease who are pre-dialysis, family members and healthcare professionals together navigate common shared decision-making processes and to assess how this impacts future treatment choice.DesignCoproductive qualitative study, underpinned by the Making Good Decisions in Collaboration shared decision-model. Semistructured interviews with a purposive sample from February 2019 - January 2020. Interview data were analysed using framework analysis. Coproduction of logic models/roadmaps and recommendations.SettingFive Welsh kidney services.Participants95 participants (37 patients, 19 family members and 39 professionals); 44 people supported coproduction (18 patients, 8 family members and 18 professionals).FindingsShared decision-making was too generic and clinically focused and had little impact on people getting onto home dialysis. Preferences of where, when and how to implement shared decision-making varied widely. Apathy experienced by patients, caused by lack of symptoms, denial, social circumstances and health systems issues made future treatment discussions difficult. Families had unmet and unrecognised needs, which significantly influenced patient decisions. Protocols containing treatment hierarchies and standards were understood by professionals but not translated for patients and families. Variation in dialysis treatment was discussed to match individual lifestyles. Patients and professionals were, however, defaulting to the perceived simplest option. It was easy for patients to opt for hospital-based treatments by listing important but easily modifiable factors.ConclusionsShared decision-making processes need to be individually tailored with more attention on patients who could choose a home therapy but select a different option. There are critical points in the decision-making process where changes could benefit patients. Patients need to be better educated and their preconceived ideas and misconceptions gently challenged. Healthcare professionals need to update their knowledge in order to provide the best advice and guidance. There needs to be more awareness of the costs and benefits of the various treatment options when making decisions.

Funder

Health and Care Research Wales

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Renal services delivery plan: 2016 to 2020 (WHC/2016/042) | GOV.WALES. Available: https://gov.wales/renal-services-delivery-plan-2016-2020-whc2016042 [Accessed 06 Sep 2021].

2. Survival of patients treated with extended-hours haemodialysis in Europe: an analysis of the ERA-EDTA registry;Jansz;Nephrol Dial Transplant,2020

3. Relationship between Dialysis Modality and Mortality

4. Benefits and risks of frequent or longer haemodialysis: weighing the evidence;Sarafidis;Nephrol Dial Transplant,2021

5. An economic assessment model for in-center, conventional home, and more frequent home hemodialysis

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A scoping review into the explanations for differences in the degrees of shared decision making experienced by patients;Patient Education and Counseling;2024-01

2. Current costs of dialysis modalities: A comprehensive analysis within the United Kingdom;Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis;2022-01-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3