Building expert consensus regarding sharing of individual research results in Alzheimer’s disease research: a Delphi study protocol

Author:

Sankary Lauren RORCID,Rico Valerie,Zelinsky Megan,Webster Helen S,Lerner Alan J,Martinez Kathryn,Ford Paul J,Tousi Babak,Leverenz James

Abstract

IntroductionInformed decisions to enrol in the clinical investigations of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) require careful consideration of complex risks and uncertain benefits. Decisions regarding whether to receive information about biomarker status are complicated by lack of scientific consensus regarding biomarkers as surrogate endpoints for Alzheimer’s disease and how information about individual risk should be evaluated and shared with research participants. This study aims to establish stakeholder consensus regarding ethically optimal approaches to sharing individual results with ADRD research participants.Methods and analysisThis Delphi consensus-building study consists of multiple online surveys conducted with Alzheimer’s disease research experts, including neurologists, neuropsychologists, ethicists, research oversight specialists and clinical trialists. Panellists will be administered questionnaires developed from a synthesis of researcher- and participant-endorsed considerations and decisional needs identified in published literature and a decisional needs assessment conducted with support from an Alzheimer’s Association Research Grant. Panellists will also be asked their views on the content and implementation of processes for sharing individual research results. ≥75% agreement will be required to achieve consensus. Response rates, level of agreement, medians, interquartile ranges and group rankings will be analysed. Following each round of data collection, our research team will undertake qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will be obtained from the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board (Study Number 22–766). Delphi panellists will receive participant information sheets describing the study before agreeing to participate in the Delphi process. Results from the data we anticipate will be generated through this research and will be submitted for peer-reviewed journal publication and presentation at international conferences.

Funder

Alzheimer's Association

Publisher

BMJ

Reference19 articles.

1. NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease

2. Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup . Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s disease: Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup. Presented at: Clinical Trials on Alzheimer’s Disease (TAD) Conference; October 25, 2023

3. Communicating and Using Dementia Risk Evidence;Rosen;J Alzheimers Dis,2022

4. Identifying best practices for disclosure of amyloid imaging results: A randomized controlled trial;Fruijtier;Alzheimers Dement,2023

5. Attitudes of Research Participants and the General Public Regarding Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Research Results;Gooblar;JAMA Neurol,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3