An international consensus panel on the potential value of Digital Surgery

Author:

Erskine JamieORCID,Abrishami Payam,Bernhard Jean-Christophe,Charter Richard,Culbertson Richard,Hiatt Jo Carol,Igarashi AtaruORCID,Purcell Jackson Gretchen,Lien Matthew,Maddern Guy,Soon Yau Ng Joseph,Patel Anita,Rha Koon Ho,Sooriakumaran Prasanna,Tackett Scott,Turchetti Giuseppe,Chalkidou Anastasia

Abstract

ObjectivesThe use of digital technology in surgery is increasing rapidly, with a wide array of new applications from presurgical planning to postsurgical performance assessment. Understanding the clinical and economic value of these technologies is vital for making appropriate health policy and purchasing decisions. We explore the potential value of digital technologies in surgery and produce expert consensus on how to assess this value.DesignA modified Delphi and consensus conference approach was adopted. Delphi rounds were used to generate priority topics and consensus statements for discussion.Setting and participantsAn international panel of 14 experts was assembled, representing relevant stakeholder groups: clinicians, health economists, health technology assessment experts, policy-makers and industry.Primary and secondary outcome measuresA scoping questionnaire was used to generate research questions to be answered. A second questionnaire was used to rate the importance of these research questions. A final questionnaire was used to generate statements for discussion during three consensus conferences. After discussion, the panel voted on their level of agreement from 1 to 9; where 1=strongly disagree and 9=strongly agree. Consensus was defined as a mean level of agreement of >7.ResultsFour priority topics were identified: (1) how data are used in digital surgery, (2) the existing evidence base for digital surgical technologies, (3) how digital technologies may assist surgical training and education and (4) methods for the assessment of these technologies. Seven consensus statements were generated and refined, with the final level of consensus ranging from 7.1 to 8.6.ConclusionPotential benefits of digital technologies in surgery include reducing unwarranted variation in surgical practice, increasing access to surgery and reducing health inequalities. Assessments to consider the value of the entire surgical ecosystem holistically are critical, especially as many digital technologies are likely to interact simultaneously in the operating theatre.

Funder

Intuitive Surgical

Publisher

BMJ

Reference41 articles.

1. Negreiro M . n.d. The rise of digital health technologies during the pandemic. 2021 Members’ Research Service, European Parliament. PE 690.548 – April 2021. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690548/EPRS_BRI(2021)690548_EN.pdf

2. Center for Devices and Radiological Health . n.d. What is digital health? U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/what-digital-health

3. NICE . Evidence standards framework for digital health technologies (ECD7), 2022. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/corporate/ecd7

4. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension;Liu;BMJ,2020

5. Current challenges and potential solutions to the use of digital health technologies in evidence generation: a narrative review;Mumtaz;Front Digit Health,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3