Vascular access specialist teams versus standard practice for catheter insertion and prevention of failure: a systematic review

Author:

Fernandez-Fernandez Ismael,Parra-García Gaizka,Blanco-Mavillard IanORCID,Carr Peter,Santos-Costa Paulo,Rodríguez-Calero Miguel Ángel

Abstract

ObjectiveBillions of vascular access devices (VADs) are inserted annually for intravenous therapy worldwide. However, their use is not without challenges. Facilitating the process and enhancing results, hospital authorities have created vascular access specialist teams (VASTs) with advanced competencies in the evaluation, insertion, care and management of VADs. The objective is to compare the effectiveness of VASTs versus standard practice regarding cannulation success and vascular access maintenance in hospitalised adults.DesignSystematic review, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.Data sourcesWe conducted a structured data search on Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCOhost up to 31 May 2023. We did not impose a time limit regarding the date of publication.Eligibility criteriaStudies were eligible for inclusion in the review if they were randomised and non-randomised trials and observational studies.Data extraction and synthesisWe included studies that described or evaluated the activity of VASTs compared with clinical practitioners. The outcomes analysed were the success of the cannulation and the incidence of associated adverse effects.ResultsThe search strategy produced 3053 papers published between 1984 and 2020, from which 12 were selected for analysis. VASTs are heterogeneously described among these studies, which mainly focus on insertions, frequently for patients with difficult intravenous access. Some patients presented with specific needs or requirement for specific insertion technique or catheter type. Compared with usual practice, these studies indicate that the involvement of a VAST is associated with a higher effectiveness in terms of first attempt insertions and insertion success rates, and a reduction in catheter-associated adverse events. However, meta-analyses confirming this trend are not currently possible.ConclusionsIt seems apparent that VASTS contribute to improving the health of patients during the administration of intravenous. VASTs seem to increase the effectiveness of VAD insertion and care and reduce complications.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021231259.

Funder

Spanish Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care: a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence

Publisher

BMJ

Reference74 articles.

1. International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters

2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control . Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in european acute care hospitals – ECDC PPS validation protocol version 3.1.2.2019. Available: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/point-prevalence-survey-healthcare-associated-infections-and-antimicrobial-use-4

3. Alexandrou E , Ray-Barruel G , Carr PJ , et al . Use of short peripheral intravenous catheters: characteristics, management, and outcomes worldwide. J Hosp Med 2018;13. doi:10.12788/jhm.3039

4. Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem

5. Accepted but Unacceptable

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3