Coproducing a physical activity referral scheme in Germany: a qualitative analysis of stakeholder experiences

Author:

Klamroth SarahORCID,Mino EriseldaORCID,Naber Inga,Weissenfels AnjaORCID,Geidl Wolfgang,Gelius Peter,Abu-Omar Karim,Pfeifer Klaus

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study evaluated stakeholders’ experiences of participating in a coproduction process to develop a physical activity referral scheme (PARS) in the German healthcare system. The focus was on examining facilitators and challenges, along with gathering insights on potential modifications to the joint development process, all from the viewpoint of stakeholders.DesignThis qualitative study employed one-to-one semi-structured interviews, and the findings were analysed using summarising qualitative content analysis.SettingThe study focused on the German healthcare system.ParticipantsSeven stakeholders from the coproduction process were purposefully selected for interviews using maximum variation sampling. The interviewees represented different sectors (physician associations, physical activity professionals’ associations, health insurance companies and patient organisations), various positions within their organisations, and different levels of attendance during the coproduction process.ResultsIn almost all interviews, the following factors were highlighted as facilitators of the development process: coproduction approach, process of coproduction, multi-sector stakeholder group, possibility of active participation, coordinating role of researchers, communication, atmosphere and interaction. In contrast, differences in roles and hierarchy, merging of different perspectives, clarification of intervention costs, and competition and conflicting interests were pointed out as challenges. Only a few suggestions regarding adaptations in terms of group composition and cooperation among stakeholders were mentioned.ConclusionsStakeholder experiences with the joint development process were predominantly positive, indicating that coproduction is a beneficial approach for the development of PARS intended for integration into healthcare systems. The effective management of power differences among stakeholders is intricately tied to the coproduction method; therefore, it should be selected carefully. The research team plays a pivotal role in coordinating and negotiating the process, and the team should be equipped with a diverse set of skills and knowledge, particularly to understand the intricacies of the healthcare system where the PARS is intended for implementation.Trial registration numberNCT04947787.

Funder

Federal Ministry of Health

Publisher

BMJ

Reference38 articles.

1. The cost of inaction on physical inactivity to public health-care systems: a population-attributable fraction analysis

2. World Health Organization . Global Status Report on Physical Activity 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2022.

3. World Health Organization . Promoting Physical Activity through Primary Health Care: A Toolkit. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.

4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Physical Activity: Exercise Referral Schemes (PH54). London: NICE, 2014.

5. World Health Organization . Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healtier World. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3