Abstract
ObjectivesThis study evaluated stakeholders’ experiences of participating in a coproduction process to develop a physical activity referral scheme (PARS) in the German healthcare system. The focus was on examining facilitators and challenges, along with gathering insights on potential modifications to the joint development process, all from the viewpoint of stakeholders.DesignThis qualitative study employed one-to-one semi-structured interviews, and the findings were analysed using summarising qualitative content analysis.SettingThe study focused on the German healthcare system.ParticipantsSeven stakeholders from the coproduction process were purposefully selected for interviews using maximum variation sampling. The interviewees represented different sectors (physician associations, physical activity professionals’ associations, health insurance companies and patient organisations), various positions within their organisations, and different levels of attendance during the coproduction process.ResultsIn almost all interviews, the following factors were highlighted as facilitators of the development process: coproduction approach, process of coproduction, multi-sector stakeholder group, possibility of active participation, coordinating role of researchers, communication, atmosphere and interaction. In contrast, differences in roles and hierarchy, merging of different perspectives, clarification of intervention costs, and competition and conflicting interests were pointed out as challenges. Only a few suggestions regarding adaptations in terms of group composition and cooperation among stakeholders were mentioned.ConclusionsStakeholder experiences with the joint development process were predominantly positive, indicating that coproduction is a beneficial approach for the development of PARS intended for integration into healthcare systems. The effective management of power differences among stakeholders is intricately tied to the coproduction method; therefore, it should be selected carefully. The research team plays a pivotal role in coordinating and negotiating the process, and the team should be equipped with a diverse set of skills and knowledge, particularly to understand the intricacies of the healthcare system where the PARS is intended for implementation.Trial registration numberNCT04947787.
Funder
Federal Ministry of Health
Reference38 articles.
1. The cost of inaction on physical inactivity to public health-care systems: a population-attributable fraction analysis
2. World Health Organization . Global Status Report on Physical Activity 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2022.
3. World Health Organization . Promoting Physical Activity through Primary Health Care: A Toolkit. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Physical Activity: Exercise Referral Schemes (PH54). London: NICE, 2014.
5. World Health Organization . Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healtier World. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.