Author:
Zapata Vazquez Rita E,Coetzee André,Harlock Edward,Simmerson Mark,Cohen Marta C
Abstract
AimsA recently proposed classification of sudden unexpected infant death incorporates consideration of possibly asphyxia. This depends on an adequate postmortem, scene investigation and history. A reliable marker of asphyxia has yet to be identified. Such a marker could assist in classifying these deaths. Our aim was to determine if the level of nucleated red blood cells (nRBCs) in the peripheral blood could help identify those possibly asphyxia-related deaths and if risk factors could influence this level in the peripheral blood.MethodsCases of sudden unexpected deaths in infancy and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) which occurred over a period of 6 years (2007–2013) and were autopsied at Sheffield Children's Hospital were reviewed and categorised according to a new classification proposed by Randall et al. The cases were then correlated with the blood level of nRBCs determined at the time of post mortem examination. The study was approved by the Clinical Governance Department, number SE331.Results139 deaths were classified into Group A (true SIDS, 67 cases), Group B (possible asphyxia related, 24 cases), Group C (non-asphyxia-related, 6 cases), Group D (no crime scene investigation, 0 cases) and Group E (identifiable cause, 42 cases). The levels were significantly increased in ex-premature babies, in infants with an underlying condition (Group C) and in deaths related to illness or trauma (Group E). There was a trend towards higher levels of nRBCs in younger age groups and in babies born to smoking mothers.ConclusionsSIDS remains a difficult diagnosis to make despite the current medical technological advances where no marker of hypoxia has yet been identified.
Subject
General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference14 articles.
1. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Unclassified Sudden Infant Deaths: A Definitional and Diagnostic Approach
2. Variation and uncertainties in the classification of sudden unexpected infant deaths among paediatric pathologists in the UK: findings of a National Delphi Study
3. Fleming P , Blair P , Bacon C , et al ., eds. Sudden unexpected death in infancy, the CESDI SUDI studies 1993–1996. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.
4. Sethuraman C , Coombs R , Cohen MC . Sudden unexpected death in infancy. In: Cohen MC , Scheimberg I, eds . The paediatric and perinatal autopsy manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014:319–29.
5. Kennedy H . Sudden unexpected death in infancy. A multi-agent to protocol for care and investigation. The report of working group convened by the Royal College of Pathologists and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2004. http://www.rcpath.org/NR/rdonlyres/30213EB6-451B-4830-A7FD-4EEFF0420260/0/SUDIreportforweb.pdf (accessed 4 Apr 2015).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献