Empowering junior doctors: a qualitative study of a QI programme in South West England

Author:

Doran Natasha JORCID,Bethune Rob,Watson Joanne,Finucane Katherine,Carson-Stevens Andrew

Abstract

AimTo explore how the South-West Foundation Doctor Quality Improvement programme affected foundation year 1 (F1) doctors’ attitudes and ability to implement change in healthcare.MethodsTwenty-two qualitative interviews were carried out with two cohorts of doctors. The first F1 group before and after their participation in the QI programme; the second group comprised those who had completed the programme between 1 and 5 years earlier. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis techniques.Results Prior to taking part in the QI programme, junior doctors’ attitudes towards QI were mixed. Although there was agreement on the importance of QI in terms of patient safety, not all shared enthusiasm for engaging in QI, while some were sceptical that they could bring about any change. Following participation in the programme, attitudes towards QI and the ability to effect change were significantly transformed. Whether their projects were considered a success or not, all juniors reported that they valued the skills learnt and the overall experience they gained through carrying out QI projects. Participants reported feeling more empowered in their role as junior doctors, with several describing how they felt ‘listened to’ and able to ‘have a voice’, that they were beginning to see things ‘at systems level’ and learning to ‘engage more critically’ in their working environment.Conclusions Junior doctors are ideally placed to engage in QI. Training in QI at the start of their medical careers may enable a new generation of doctors to acquire the skills necessary to improve patient safety and quality of care.

Funder

South West Academic Health Science Network

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Francis R . Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS foundation trust public inquiry , 2013.

2. Berwick D . National advisory group on the safety of patients in england. a promise to learn - a commitment to act. London: Department of Health, 2013.

3. Keogh B , Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England: overview report NHS England. 2013. Available from: http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/bruce-keogh-review/Documents/outcomes/keogh-review-final-report.pdf [Accessed 02 May 2016].

4. How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types: Table 1

5. Improvement and evaluation

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating the impact of junior doctors in quality improvement – a 10-year review;Australian Health Review;2023-07-04

2. Aligning quality improvement with better child health for the 21st century;Archives of disease in childhood - Education & practice edition;2020-12-18

3. Case for junior clinical leadership teams;Postgraduate Medical Journal;2020-09-15

4. Foundation doctors and quality improvement: frustrations from the frontline;Postgraduate Medical Journal;2019-11-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3