Abstract
Purpose of the studyEstablished over 2000 years ago, horoscopes remain a regular feature in contemporary society. We aimed to assess whether there could be a link between zodiac sign and medical occupation, asking the question—did your specialty choose you?Study designA questionnaire-based study was distributed using an online survey tool. Questions explored the zodiac sign, specialty preferences and personality features of physicians.Results1923 physicians responded between February and March 2020. Variations in personality types between different medical specialties were observed, introverts being highly represented in oncology (71.4%) and rheumatology (65.4%), and extroverts in sexual health (55%), gastroenterology (44.4%) and obstetrics and gynaecology (44.2%) (p<0.01). Proportions of zodiac signs in each specialty also varied; for example, cardiologists were more likely to be Leo compared with Aries (14.4% vs 3.9%, p=0.047), medical physicians more likely Capricorn than Aquarius (10.4% vs 6.7%, p=0.02) and obstetricians and gynaecologists more likely Pisces than Sagittarius (17.5% vs 0%, p=0.036). Intensive care was the most commonly reported second choice career, but this also varied between zodiac signs and specialties. Fountain pen use was associated with extroversion (p=0.049) and gastroenterology (p<0.01).ConclusionsPersonality types vary in different specialties. There may be links to zodiac signs which warrant further investigation.
Reference29 articles.
1. Astrology;Carlson;Experientia,1988
2. Stars, spirits, signs: towards a history of astrology 1100–1800;Kassell;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,2010
3. Guru PNG . Astrology Zodiac constellation 2020. Available: https://www.pngguru.com [Accessed July 2020].
4. Thiessen M . The 12 signs of the Zodiac 2020. astrology online. available from. Available: https://www.astrology-online.com/persn.htm [Accessed on July 2020].
5. Thagard PR . Editor why astrology is a pseudoscience. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1978.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献