Empirical rescue treatment ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection in third and subsequent lines: 8-year experience in 2144 patients from the European Registry onH. pylorimanagement (Hp-EuReg)
Author:
Burgos-Santamaría DiegoORCID, Nyssen Olga P, Gasbarrini Antonio, Vaira Dino, Pérez-Aisa Ángeles, Rodrigo Luís, Pellicano Rinaldo, Keco-Huerga Alma, Pabón-Carrasco Manuel, Castro-Fernandez Manuel, Boltin Doron, Barrio Jesus, Phull Perminder, Kupcinskas JuozasORCID, Jonaitis Laimas, Ortiz-Polo Inmaculada, Tepes BojanORCID, Lucendo Alfredo J, Huguet José María, Areia MiguelORCID, Jurecic Natasa Brglez, Denkovski Maja, Bujanda Luís, Ramos-San Román June, Cuadrado-Lavín AntonioORCID, Gomez-Camarero Judith, Jiménez Moreno Manuel Alfonso, Lanas Angel, Martinez-Dominguez Samuel Jesús, Alfaro Enrique, Marcos-Pinto Ricardo, Milivojevic Vladimir, Rokkas TheodoreORCID, Leja MarcisORCID, Smith SineadORCID, Tonkić Ante, Buzás György Miklós, Doulberis Michael, Venerito Marino, Lerang Frode, Bordin Dmitry SORCID, Lamy Vincent, Capelle Lisette G, Marlicz WojciechORCID, Dobru Daniela, Gridnyev Oleksiy, Puig Ignasi, Mégraud Francis, O'Morain Colm, Gisbert Javier PORCID
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the use, effectiveness and safety ofHelicobacter pyloriempirical rescue therapy in third and subsequent treatment lines in Europe.DesignInternational, prospective, non-interventional registry of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists. Data were collected and quality reviewed until October 2021 at Asociación Española de Gastroenterología-Research Electronic Data Capture. All cases with three or more empirical eradication attempts were assessed for effectiveness by modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis.ResultsOverall, 2144 treatments were included: 1519, 439, 145 and 41 cases from third, fourth, fifth and sixth treatment lines, respectively. Sixty different therapies were used; the 15 most frequently prescribed encompassed >90% of cases. Overall effectiveness remained <90% in all therapies. Optimised treatments achieved a higher eradication rate than non-optimised (78% vs 67%, p<0.0001). From 2017 to 2021, only 44% of treatments other than 10-day single-capsule therapy used high proton-pump inhibitor doses and lasted ≥14 days. Quadruple therapy containing metronidazole, tetracycline and bismuth achieved optimal eradication rates only when prescribed as third-line treatment, either as 10-day single-capsule therapy (87%) or as 14-day traditional therapy with tetracycline hydrochloride (95%). Triple amoxicillin-levofloxacin therapy achieved 90% effectiveness in Eastern Europe only or when optimised. The overall incidence of adverse events was 31%.ConclusionEmpirical rescue treatment in third and subsequent lines achieved suboptimal effectiveness in most European regions. Only quadruple bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline (10-day single-capsule or 14-day traditional scheme) and triple amoxicillin-levofloxacin therapies reached acceptable outcomes in some settings. Compliance with empirical therapy optimisation principles is still poor 5 years after clinical practice guidelines update.Trial registration numberNCT02328131.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|