Author:
Teoh Anthony Y B,Dhir Vinay,Kida Mitsuhiro,Yasuda Ichiro,Jin Zhen Dong,Seo Dong Wan,Almadi Majid,Ang Tiing Leong,Hara Kazuo,Hilmi Ida,Itoi Takao,Lakhtakia Sundeep,Matsuda Koji,Pausawasdi Nonthalee,Puri Rajesh,Tang Raymond S,Wang Hsiu-Po,Yang Ai Ming,Hawes Robert,Varadarajulu Shyam,Yasuda Kenjiro,Ho Lawrence Khek Yu
Abstract
ObjectivesInterventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures are gaining popularity and the most commonly performed procedures include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation. The aim of this paper is to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of the above procedures.MethodsFormulation of the guidelines was based on the best scientific evidence available. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology (RAM) was used. Panellists recruited comprised experts in surgery, interventional EUS, interventional radiology and oncology from 11 countries. Between June 2014 and October 2016, the panellists met in meetings to discuss and vote on the clinical scenarios for each of the interventional EUS procedures in question.ResultsA total of 15 statements on EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, 15 statements on EUS-guided biliary drainage, 12 statements on EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and 14 statements on EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation were formulated. The statements addressed the indications for the procedures, technical aspects, pre- and post-procedural management, management of complications, and competency and training in the procedures. All statements except one were found to be appropriate. Randomised studies to address clinical questions in a number of aspects of the procedures are urgently required.ConclusionsThe current guidelines on interventional EUS procedures are the first published by an endoscopic society. These guidelines provide an in-depth review of the current evidence and standardise the management of the procedures.
Reference187 articles.
1. EUS 2008 Working Group document: interventional EUS—a road map for the future;Hawes;Gastrointest Endosc,2009
2. Fitch K , Bernstein SJ , Aguilar MD , et al ; The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Santa Barbara, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001.
3. A RAND/UCLA appropriateness study of the management of familial gastric cancer;Dixon;Ann Surg Oncol,2013
4. Evaluation of treatment options for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of appropriateness, using the validated semi-quantitative RAND corporation/University of California, Los Angeles methodology
5. Appropriate customization of radiation therapy for stage II and III rectal cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Statement using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method;Goodman;Pract Radiat Oncol,2016
Cited by
178 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献