Performance of colorectal cancer screening in the European Union Member States: data from the second European screening report

Author:

Senore CarloORCID,Basu Partha,Anttila Ahti,Ponti Antonio,Tomatis Mariano,Vale Diama Bhadra,Ronco Gugliemo,Soerjomataram Isabelle,Primic-Žakelj Maja,Riggi Emilia,Dillner Joakim,Elfström Miriam Klara,Lönnberg Stefan,Sankaranarayanan Rengaswamy,Segnan Nereo

Abstract

ObjectiveTo present comparative data about the performance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes in the European Union Member States (EU MSs).DesignCross-sectional study. We analysed key performance indicators—participation rate, positivity rate (PR), detection rate (DR) and positive predictive value for adenomas and CRC—based on the aggregated quantitative data collected for the second EU screening report. We derived crude and pooled (through a random effects model) estimates to describe and compare trends across different MSs/regions and screening protocols.ResultsParticipation rate was higher in countries adopting faecal immunochemical test (FIT) (range: 22.8%–71.3%) than in those using guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) (range 4.5%–66.6%), and it showed a positive correlation (ρ=0.842, p<0.001) with participation in breast cancer screening in the same areas. Screening performance showed a large variability. Compliance with referral for colonoscopy (total colonoscopy (TC)) assessment ranged between 64% and 92%; TC completion rate ranged between 92% and 99%. PR and DR of advanced adenomas and CRC were higher in FIT, as compared with gFOBT programmes, and independent of the protocol among men, older subjects and those performing their first screening.ConclusionsThe variability in the results of quality indicators across population-based screening programmes highlights the importance of continuous monitoring, as well as the need to promote quality improvement efforts, as recommended in the EU guidelines. The implementation of monitoring systems, ensuring availability of data for the entire process, together with initiatives aimed to enhance reproducibility of histology and quality of endoscopy, represent a priority in screening programmes management.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Gastroenterology

Reference21 articles.

1. European Code against Cancer, 4th Edition: cancer screening;Armaroli;Cancer Epidemiol,2015

2. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force;Lin;JAMA,2016

3. Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on Cancer Screening (2003/878/EC). OJ L. 2003;327:34–8.

4. Segnan N , Patnick J , von Karsa L . European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010.

5. Von Karsa L , Anttila A , Ronco G , et al . Cancer Screening in the European Union Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screening first report. Brussel: European Communities, 2008.

Cited by 111 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3