Extended CPAP or low-flow nasal cannula for intermittent hypoxaemia in preterm infants: a 24-hour randomised clinical trial

Author:

Yazdi SiamakORCID,Carlo Waldemar A,Nakhmani Arie,Boateng Ernestina O,Aban Immaculada,Ambalavanan Namasivayam,Travers Colm PORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveOptimal timing of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) cessation in preterm infants remains undetermined. We hypothesised that CPAP extension compared with weaning to low-flow nasal cannula (NC) reduces intermittent hypoxaemia (IH) and respiratory instability in preterm infants meeting criteria to discontinue CPAP.DesignSingle-centre randomised clinical trial.SettingLevel 4 neonatal intensive care unit.Patients36 infants <34 weeks’ gestation receiving CPAP≤5 cmH2O and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤0.30 and meeting respiratory stability criteria.InterventionsExtended CPAP was compared with weaning to low-flow NC (0.5 L/kg/min with a limit of 1.0 L/min) for 24 hours.OutcomesThe primary outcome was IH (number of episodes with SpO2<85% lasting ≥10 s). Secondary outcomes included: coefficient of variability of SpO2, proportion of time in various SpO2ranges, episodes (≥10 s) with SpO2<80%, median cerebral and renal oxygenation, median effective FiO2, median transcutaneous carbon dioxide and bradycardia (<100/min for≥10 s).ResultsThe median (IQR) episodes of IH per 24-hour period was 20 (6–48) in the CPAP group and 76 (18–101) in the NC group (p=0.03). Infants continued on CPAP had less bradycardia, time with SpO2<91% and <85%, and lower FiO2(all p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in IH<80%, median transcutaneous carbon dioxide or median cerebral or renal oxygenation.ConclusionIn preterm infants meeting respiratory stability criteria for CPAP cessation, extended CPAP decreased IH, bradycardia and other hypoxaemia measures compared with weaning to low-flow NC during the 24-hour intervention.Trial registration numberNCT04792099.

Funder

Dixon Foundation

NIH/NHLBI

Publisher

BMJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3