Can mediation avoid litigation in conflicts about medical treatment for children? An analysis of previous litigation in England and Wales

Author:

Neefjes VeronicaORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the reasons why parents disagree with their clinicians in cases reaching the court and to estimate the number of cases in which mediation might have avoided litigation.DesignAnalysis of 83 published cases regarding medical treatment decisions for children initiated either by an NHS Trust or Local Authority between 1990 and 1 July 2022.ResultsThe analysis found that the main areas of contention are different value judgements, different interpretations of observable events such as the health of the child, their quality of life or burden of treatment and relational issues (ie, loss of trust). More than half of the cases are estimated not to have been preventable by mediation because either no conflict existed (n=13) or the parental decision was based on strongly held, mostly faith-based, views unlikely to be open for discussion (n=31).ConclusionThe potential of mediation to avoid future litigation may be more limited than hoped for.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference32 articles.

1. Munby J . Transparency in the family courts. publication of judgments [Practice Guidance]. 2014. Available: https://www.familylaw.co.uk/articles/practice-guidances-of-16-january-2014-on-publication-of-judgments-transparency-in-the-family-courts-and-in-the-court-of-protection [Accessed 16 Jan 2023].

2. McFarlane A . Confidence and confidentiality: transparency in the family courts. 2021. Available: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Confidence-and-Confidentiality-Transparency-in-the-Family-Courts-final.pdf [Accessed 16 Jan 2023].

3. Gard and Yates v. GOSH, the guardian and the United Kingdom: reflections on the legal process and the legal principles;Bridgeman;Med Law Int,2017

4. Austin L , Huxtable R . Resolving disagreements about the care of critically ill children: evaluating existing processes and setting the research agenda. In: Parental Rights, Best Interests and Significant Harms: -Great Ormond Street Hospital v Gard. Hart Publishing, 2019.

5. Conflicts and communication gaps in the intensive care unit

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3