Factors that may improve paediatric workplace-based assessments: an exploratory study

Author:

Jefferies KimberleyORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo establish if paediatric trainees are satisfied with the current workplace-based assessment (WBA) process. To identify factors that contribute both positively and negatively to the educational experience during WBAs. To find out if trainees and their supervisors experience any challenges conducting WBAs. To establish potential ways to improve future assessments.DesignQualitative semistructured interviews.SettingParticipants included fifteen trainees (ST1–8) in general paediatric and subspecialty posts and four consultants or equivalent across five hospital sites in the Thames Valley Deanery. All participants had regular exposure to WBAs.InterventionsInterviews were undertaken between June 2020 and January 2021 via video link. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively using constant comparison until theoretical sufficiency was achieved.Main outcome measureUsing Constructivist Grounded Theory, a theoretical framework, grounded in the data, was developed that depicted the core elements that should be present to optimise WBAs.ResultsA number of key components were reported to affect the educational value of WBAs. A positive departmental culture towards education and training is essential. Chosen cases should be challenging, and direct observation or in-depth discussion, depending on the assessment type, is fundamental. Timely constructive feedback and immediate completion of the assessment form are also imperative.ConclusionSome trainees experienced WBAs where these key components aligned, but many did not, and this negatively affected their learning. Three main challenges or future targets for further improvements include increasing time, improving training and optimising technology.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference24 articles.

1. House of commons health Committee: Modernising medical careers. Third report of session 2007–08. Volume I. Available: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmhealth/25/25i.pdf [Accessed 16 Feb 2021].

2. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31

3. RCPCH . RCPCH progress: assessment Strategy-Paediatrics specialty postgraduate training 2017. Available: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-10/RCPCH%20Progress%20Assessment%20Strategy%20v1.2%2011.10.19_0.pdf [Accessed 20 Jan 2021].

4. Case-based discussion: assessment tool or teaching aid?;Jyothirmayi;Clin Oncol,2012

5. RCPCH . Progress curriculum: paediatric speciality postgraduate training 2017. version 1. Available: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-10/RCPCH_Progress_CurriculumV1.pdf [Accessed 20 Jan 2021].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3