Abstract
ObjectivesCongenital heart disease (CHD) is now a leading contributor of infant and neonatal mortality in many low/middle-income countries including India. We established a prospective neonatal heart disease registry in Kerala to understand presentation of CHD, proportion of newborns with critical defects who receive timely intervention, outcomes at 1 month, predictors of mortality and barriers to timely management.MethodsThe congenital heart disease registry for newborns (≤28 days) in Kerala (CHRONIK) was a prospective hospital-based registry involving 47 hospitals from 1 June 2018 to 31 May 2019. All CHDs, except small shunts with a high likelihood of spontaneous closure, were included. Data on demographics, complete diagnosis, details of antenatal and postnatal screening, mode of transport and distance travelled and need for surgical or percutaneous interventions and survival were collected.ResultsOf the 1474 neonates with CHD identified, 418 (27%) had critical CHD, 22% of whom died at 1 month. Median age at diagnosis of critical CHD was 1 (0–22) day. Pulse oximeter screening identified 72% of critical CHD and 14% were diagnosed prenatally. Only 8% of neonates with duct-dependent lesions were transported on prostaglandin. Preoperative mortality accounted for 86% all deaths. On multivariable analysis, only birth weight (OR 2.7; 95% CI 2.1 to 6.5; p<0.0005) and duct-dependent systemic circulation (OR 6.43; 95% CI 5 to 21.8, p<0.0005) were predictive of mortality.ConclusionsWhile systematic screening, especially pulse oximetry screening, enabled early identification and prompt management of a significant proportion of neonates with critical CHD, important health system challenges like low use of prostaglandin need to be overcome to minimise preoperative mortality.
Funder
Cardiology Society of India
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference28 articles.
1. Global, regional, and national progress towards sustainable development goal 3.2 for neonatal and child health: all-cause and cause-specific mortality findings from the global burden of disease study 2019;Paulson;The Lancet,2021
2. Franke RW , Chasin BH . Is the Kerala model sustainable? lessons from the past, prospects for the future. In: Kerala: The Development Experience, Reflections on Sustainability and Replicability 2000. n.d.: 5.
3. State Health Profile, National Health Authority . State health profile-Kerala. 2021. Available: mjay.gov.in/
4. Global, regional, and national burden of congenital heart disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017;Zimmerman;The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health,2020
5. Nair SM , Zheleva B , Dobrzycka A , et al . A population health approach to address the burden of congenital heart disease in Kerala, India. Glob Heart 2021;16:71. doi:10.5334/gh.1034
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献