Measuring Oxygenation in Newborn Infants with Targeted Oxygen Ranges (MONITOR): a randomised crossover pilot study

Author:

Christie Fraser GORCID,Kelly RodORCID,Boardman James PORCID,Stenson Ben JORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveThe Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis (NeOProM) Collaboration showed that high (91–95%) versus low (85–89%) SpO2targets reduced mortality. Trials of higher targets are needed to determine whether any more survival advantage may be gained. This pilot study explored the achieved oxygenation patterns observed when targeting SpO292–97% to facilitate the design of future trials.DesignSingle-centre prospective randomised crossover pilot study. Manual FiO2adjustment. Study time 12 hours per infant. 6 hours targeting SpO290–95% and 6 hours targeting SpO292–97%.PatientsTwenty preterm infants born <29 weeks’ gestation, greater than 48 hours old, receiving supplemental oxygen.OutcomesPrimary outcome was percentage time with SpO2above 97% and below 90%. Pre-defined secondary outcomes included percentage time spent within, above or below transcutaneous PO2(TcPO2) 6.7–10.7 kPa (50–80 mm Hg). Comparisons were made using paired-samples t-test (2-tailed).ResultsWith SpO2target 92–97% versus 90–95%, the mean (IQR) percentage time above SpO297% was 11.3% (2.7–20.9) versus 7.8% (1.7–13.9), p=0.02. Percentage time with SpO2<90% was 13.1% (6.7–19.1) versus 17.9% (11.1–22.4), p=0.003. Percentage time with SpO2<80% was 1% (0.1–1.4) versus 1.6% (0.4–2.6), p=0.119. Percentage time with TcPO2<6.7 kPa (50 mm Hg) was 49.6% (30.2–66.0) versus 55% (34.3–73.5), p=0.63. Percentage time above TcPO210.7 kPa (80 mm Hg) was 1.4% (0–1.4) versus 1.8% (0–0), p=0.746.ConclusionsTargeting SpO292–97% produced a right shift in SpO2and TcPO2distribution, with reduced time at SpO2<90% and increased time at SpO2>97%, without increasing time with TcPO2>10.7 kPa (80 mm Hg). Clinical trials targeting this higher SpO2range could be conducted without significant hyperoxic exposure.Trial registration numberNCT03360292.

Funder

Simpsons Special Care Babies (SSCB) charity

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3