Incidence, impact and indicators of difficult intubations in the neonatal intensive care unit: a report from the National Emergency Airway Registry for Neonates

Author:

Sawyer Taylor,Foglia Elizabeth EORCID,Ades Anne,Moussa Ahmed,Napolitano Natalie,Glass Kristen,Johnston Lindsay,Jung Philipp,Singh Neetu,Quek Bin Huey,Barry James,Zenge Jeanne,DeMeo Stephen D,Brei Brianna,Krick Jeanne,Kim Jae H,Nadkarni Vinay,Nishisaki Akira

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the incidence, indicators and clinical impact of difficult tracheal intubations in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).DesignRetrospective review of prospectively collected data on intubations performed in the NICU from the National Emergency Airway Registry for Neonates.SettingTen academic NICUs.PatientsNeonates intubated in the NICU at each of the sites between October 2014 and March 2017.Main outcome measuresDifficult intubation was defined as one requiring three or more attempts by a non-resident provider. Patient (age, weight and bedside predictors of difficult intubation), practice (intubation method and medications used), provider (training level and profession) and outcome data (intubation attempts, adverse events and oxygen desaturations) were collected for each intubation.ResultsOut of 2009 tracheal intubations, 276 (14%) met the definition of difficult intubation. Difficult intubations were more common in neonates <32 weeks, <1500 g. The difficult intubation group had a 4.9 odds ratio (OR) for experiencing an adverse event and a 4.2 OR for severe oxygen desaturation. Bedside screening tests of difficult intubation lacked sensitivity (receiver operator curve 0.47–0.53).ConclusionsDifficult intubations are common in the NICU and are associated with adverse event and severe oxygen desaturation. Difficult intubations occur more commonly in small preterm infants. The occurrence of a difficult intubation in other neonates is hard to predict due to the lack of sensitivity of bedside screening tests.

Funder

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3