AB0347 TREATMENT RESPONSE WITH ABATACEPT PLUS METHOTREXATE TREATMENT FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE FROM THE UK

Abstract

BackgroundA previous real-world study has reported the characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received abatacept in UK clinical practice.1,2 However, many of the eligible population received abatacept monotherapy rather than as indicated. A subgroup analysis of patients treated with abatacept in combination with methotrexate (ABA + MTX) was therefore undertaken to explore the treatment effect in this specific patient population.ObjectivesPresent a subgroup analysis describing the clinical outcomes of patients with RA treated with ABA + MTX in UK real-world clinical practice.MethodsA multi-centre, retrospective observational study was undertaken in patients with RA treated with abatacept at any line of therapy between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017, across four UK centres. Data were collected from patient medical records from index date, defined as the date of first bDMARD initiation, to most recent RA clinic visit, death or end of study (31 December 2017). Clinical outcomes (disease activity and response to treatment) were measured using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Patients that received abatacept outside indication (i.e., without concomitant methotrexate) were retrospectively excluded from the analysis dataset. Statistical analyses for the ABA + MTX subgroup were repeated in line with the methodology previously reported.1,2ResultsThis subgroup analysis included 133 patients, of 213 patients included in the original study, with RA that received ABA + MTX (mean age 54.6 years, 77.4% female, 7.5 years mean duration of RA at index date). At index date, 64.8% of patients were positive for both anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF), where data were available. In total, 77.8% of patients were categorised with high disease activity at index, with mean DAS28-ESR of 6.2 (SD 1.1).Irrespective of line of treatment (LOT), patients tended to have a more favourable distribution of good/moderate/no EULAR response when receiving ABA + MTX (31.8%/34.1%/34.1%; n=44) compared with receipt of other bDMARDs (12.7%/36.4%/50.9%; n=55) at 6 months. Similarly, a favourable distribution of good/moderate/no EULAR response in favour of those receiving ABA + MTX compared with other bDMARDs was observed at 12 months (30.6%/41.7%/27.8% versus 20.0%/35.0%/45.0%, respectively).Patients receiving ABA + MTX remained on treatment for significantly longer than patients in receipt of other bDMARDs as first LOT (median time on treatment 53.4 vs 18.1 months; p<0.01). A similar trend was observed at second LOT, although differences were not statistically significant (median time on treatment 40.1 vs 19.7 months; p =0.08).ConclusionPatients with RA who received treatment with any bDMARDs, including ABA + MTX, experienced reduced disease activity. However, those receiving ABA + MTX persisted with treatment significantly longer than when receiving other bDMARDs.References[1]Choy, E. et al. Outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with abatacept: a UK multi-centre observational study. BMC Rheumatology5, 3, doi:10.1186/s41927-020-00173-0 (2021).[2]Henning, S. et al. AB0295 CHANGE IN DISEASE ACTIVITY AND TREATMENT RESPONSE AFTER ABATACEPT TREATMENT FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE FROM THE UK. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases79, 1446-1447, doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1069 (2020).AcknowledgementsThis analysis was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb.Disclosure of InterestsErnest Choy Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myer Squibbs, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Biocon, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, R-Pharm and Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Bio-Cancer, Biogen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Sadie Henning Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Yes, Bristol Myers Squibb, Marie Brazil Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Currently an employee of Bristol Myers Squibb, Kevin Pollock Shareholder of: Yes - Bristol Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Yes - Merck Sharp & Dohme and Glaxo Smith Kline, Consultant of: Yes - Merck Sharp & Dohme, Employee of: Yes – currently employed by Bristol Myers Squibb, Lara Groves Grant/research support from: I am an employee of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Cardiff, UK, who received fees from Bristol Myers Squibb in relation to this study, Daniel Sugrue Grant/research support from: I am an employee of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Cardiff, UK, who received fees from Bristol Myers Squibb in relation to this study, John Houghton Grant/research support from: I am an employee of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Cardiff, UK, who received fees from Bristol Myers Squibb in relation to this study