AB0188 ULTRASONOGRAPHIC RESIDUAL INTRA-ARTICULAR SYNOVITIS IS MORE SEVERE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH PREDNISOLONE

Abstract

BackgroundThe treatment option including biological DMARDs (BIO) and JAK inhibitor (JAK) was expanded, and the number of patients reached to the treatment target are increasing in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). On the other hand, it is also true that some patients are still using prednisolone (PSL). Recently, ultrasound has played a role of sensitive imaging modality in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with RA. It is known that residual synovitis was found in ultrasound even in patients with clinical remission.ObjectivesWe investigated the differences of ultrasonographic intra-articular synovitis findings between treatment drugs in patients with RA.MethodsFrom January 2017 to August 2020, 750 RA patients who underwent ultrasound examination were included. A US examination was performed at the bilateral first to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, first interphalangeal (IP) and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, wrist joints (three part of radial, medial and ulnar) and first to fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, by using HI VISION Ascendus (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Japan) with a multifrequency linear transducer (18-6 MHz). The gray scale and power Doppler findings were assessed by the semi-quantitative method (0-3). All patients were divided into with or without BIO / JAK, methotrexate (MTX) and PSL. Then, patients were matched using the propensity score adjusted for gender, age, RA disease duration, disease activity, CRP value, and MMP-3 value. The total gray scale and power Doppler score (GSUS / PDUS) were compared between treatment drugs of RA by using propensity score matching methods.ResultsThe average age of 750 RA patients were 64.5 years and an average disease duration of RA was 13.9 years and females were 581 (77.5%). There were 517 patients (68.9%) treated with BIO/JAK and 233 patients treated without BIO/JAK. The 205 patients in each group were matched. GSUS were 10.6±11.1 vs 9.2±10.4 (p=0.218) and PDUS 7.4±9.2 vs 6.5±9.0 (p=0.328). Ultrasound residual synovitis was not different between with or without BIO/JAK in matched patients. There were 525 patients (70.0%) treated MTX, the average MTX dose was 9.3 mg, and 225 patients treated without MTX. The 203 patients with or without MTX in each group were matched. GSUS were 9.7±10.6 vs 11.4±12.0 (p=0.119) and PDUS 6.6±8.8 vs 8.1±10.1 (p=0.117). Ultrasound residual synovitis was not different between with or without MTX in matched patients. There were 111 patients (14.8%) treated PSL, the average dose was 4.0mg, and 639 patients treated without PSL. The 105 patients with or without PSL in each group were matched. GSUS were 15.7±13.9 vs 11.6±10.6 (p=0.018) and PDUS 11.5±11.4 vs 8.1±9.6 (p=0.021). Ultrasound residual synovitis was more severe treated with PSL than without PSL in matched patients.ConclusionIn a comparison between RA patients matched backgrounds such as disease activity, there was no difference in ultrasound residual synovitis between patients with or without BIO/JAK and MTX. However, there was significant difference in patients with or without PSL. This suggests that PSL use suppresses clinical symptoms but does not improve synovitis. Thus, it should be noted that joint destruction may progress in patients treating with PSL.References[1]Grassi W, Okano T, Di Geso L, Filippucci E. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: options, uses and optimization. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:1131-46.[2]Nguyen H, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Gandjbakhch F, Constantin A, Foltz V, Cantagrel A. Prevalence of ultrasound-detected residual synovitis and risk of relapse and structural progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53:2110-8.AcknowledgementsWe wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama, Tomoko Nishimura for clinical assistant, Setsuko Takeda, Emi Yamashita, Yuko Yoshida, Emi Ohtani, Yuka Domae, Asami Yagami, Shingo Washida for their special efforts as a sonographer and collecting data.Disclosure of InterestsTadashi Okano Speakers bureau: Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Abbvie, Amgen, Ayumi, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, Grant/research support from: Asahi Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Kenji Mamoto: None declared, Yutaro Yamada: None declared, Koji Mandai: None declared, Shohei Anno: None declared, Masahiro Tada: None declared, Kentaro Inui Speakers bureau: Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Abbvie GK, Pfizer Inc., Eisai Co.,Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi K.K., Abbvie GK, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., QOL RD Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co.,Ltd.,, Tatsuya Koike Speakers bureau: Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Abbott Japan, Teijin Pharma, Banyu Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical, Hiroaki Nakamura: None declared