AB0338 BELIEFS ABOUT BIOLOGIC DRUGS AMONG RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS

Author:

Hannech E.,Boussaid S.,Rekik S.,Rahmouni S.,Jemmali S.,Ajlani H.,Sahli H.,Elleuch M.,Dhahri R.,Gharsallah I.

Abstract

BackgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease requiring a long-term follow-up and the use of chronic therapies. The management of this disease is based on a multidisciplinary care, requiring total patient involvement. Previous personal experiences, the experiences of others and the daily impact of the disease on patients fuel their perceptions of the treatment especially biologic one. There are few studies evaluating patient’s beliefs about these drugs [1,2].ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to investigate beliefs about biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) among patients with RA and to identify factors related to specific beliefs.MethodsWe conducted a bi-centric cross-sectional study, including patients with RA fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria. All patients were on bDMARDs associated or no to conventional synthetic (sc) DMARDs. Sociodemographic, clinical, biologic, and therapeutic data were collected. Patients were interviewed about their medication beliefs using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ).ResultsThere were 75 RA patients: 60 female (80%) and 15 males (20%). The sex ratio was about 0.25. The mean age was 56.92 ± 9.06 years [34-80]. Thirty-three percent of patients were illiterate. Twenty patients were employed. Sixty-four patients (85.3%) were married. The mean disease duration was 14.85 ± 8.5 years [2-39]. Thirty-three patients had joint deformities. Twenty-seven patients had extra-articular manifestations and thirty-six patients had comorbidities. The mean disease activity scale (DAS28 CRP) was 3.94 ± 1.32 [1.21-7.15]. Fifteen patients (20%) had high disease activity, 11% had low disease activity, and 19% were in remission. The mean functional impairment scale (HAQ) was 0.64 ± 0.48 [0-2.2]. Twelve patients had moderate to severe disability and only one patient had severe to very severe disability. The mean duration of the current bDMARD was 37.17 ± 39.44 months and the mean rank of the current biotherapy was 1.41 ± 0.9 [1-5].Regarding the BMQ, the mean score for General Overuse was 14 ± 2.37 [6-20]. The mean score for General Harm was 10.82 ± 4.42 [4-20].The mean score of patients’ specific beliefs regarding the necessity of taking the current bDMARD (Specific Necessity) was 20.62 ± 5.71 [5-25]. The mean Specific Concerns score regarding the current bDMARD was 10.33 ± 3.29 [5-25]. Necessity about taking bDMARD was reported by 77.3% patients in the present and 61.3 % patients consider maintaining the bDMARD in the future.There were 4% of patients who reported concerns about taking bDMARD. Twenty four percent of patients reported concerns about long term effects, and 16% about becoming too dependent on bDMARD.Beliefs about the necessity to stop occasionally chronic therapies were reported by 13.3% of patients.Specific necessity was correlated to the current bDMARD duration (p=0.01), Patient Global Evaluation (p=0.03), VAS pain scale (p<10-3), the number of nocturnal awakenings (p=0.01), tender joint count (p<10-3), swollen joint count ((p<10-3), HAQ (p=0.005), DAS28 (CRP) (p<10-3). Specific concerns were correlated to the actual bDMARD rank (p=0.01).ConclusionOur study showed stronger beliefs in the necessity of taking biologic drugs if indicated. Disease activity parameters and functional impairment influence those beliefs. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of beliefs on biologic drug adherence.References[1]Cea-Calvo L, Raya E, Marras C, Salman-Monte TC, Ortiz A, Salvador G, et al. The beliefs of rheumatoid arthritis patients in their subcutaneous biological drug: strengths and areas of concern. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38(9):1735‑40.[2]Heuckelum M van, Linn AJ, Vandeberg L, Hebing RCF, Dijk L van, Vervloet M, et al. Implicit and explicit attitudes towards disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs as possible target for improving medication adherence. Plos One. 2019;14(8):e0221290.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3