The value of anal swab RT-PCR for COVID-19 diagnosis in adult Indonesian patients

Author:

Abdullah MurdaniORCID,Sudrajat Dedy Gunawanjati,Muzellina Virly Nanda,Kurniawan Juferdy,Rizka Aulia,Utari Amanda Pitarini,Pribadi Rabbinu Rangga,Idrus Muhammad Firhat,Yusra Yusra,Meilany Sofy,Surandy Andry,Shatri Hamzah,Rinaldi Ikhwan,Pitoyo Ceva Wicaksono,Renaldi Kaka

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study will test the performance of the anal swab PCR test when compared with the nasopharyngeal swab PCR test as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19.DesignAn observational descriptive study which included hospitalised suspected, or probable cases of hopitalised COVID-19 patients, conducted in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Hospital, Ciputra Hospital, Mitra Keluarga Depok Hospital and Mitra Keluarga Kelapa Gading Hospital, Indonesia. Epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiology data were obtained. Nasopharyngeal and anal swabs specimens were collected for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection.ResultsWe analysed 136 subjects as part of this study. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 manifesation in this study was typical of hospitalised patients, with 25% classified as mild cases, 14.7% in severe condition and 12.5% of subjects classified as having acute respiratory distress syndrome. When compared with nasopharyngeal swab as the standard specimen for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen, the sensitivity and specificity of the anal swab was 36.7% and 93.8%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value were 97.8% and 16.5 %, respectively. The performance of the anal swab remained similar when only the subgroup of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (n=92, 67.6%) was analysed (sensitivity 40% and specificity 91.7%). Out of all the subjects included in analysis, 67.6% had gastrointestinal symptoms. Similarly, 73.3% of patients in the anal swab-positive group had gastrointestinal symptoms. The two most common gastrointestinal symptoms in the subjects’ population were nausea and anorexia.ConclusionAnal swab specimen has low sensitivity (36.7%) but high specificity (93.8%) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigen by RT-PCR. Only one additional positive result was found by anal swab among the nasopharyngeal swab-negative group. Anal swab may not be needed as an additional test at the beginning of a patient’s diagnostic investigation and nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR remains as the standard diagnostic test for COVID-19.

Funder

Indonesian Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Gastroenterology

Reference21 articles.

1. Coronavirus Update (Live): 101,433,090 Cases and 2,184,120 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer [Internet]. Worldometers.info, 2020. Available: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ [Accessed 28 Jan 2020].

2. BNPB. [Internet]. Covid19.go.id. 2021. Available: https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran[Internet] [Accessed 28 Jan 2020].

3. COVID-19 S . Peta Sebaran | Satgas Penanganan COVID-19 [Internet]. covid19.go.id, 2020. Available: https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran [Accessed cited 4 November 2020].

4. Wang W , Xu Y , Gao R , et al . Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA 2020;2.doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3786

5. Evidence for Gastrointestinal Infection of SARS-CoV-2

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3