Affiliation:
1. HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, REYHANLI SOSYAL BİLİMLER MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU
2. MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, SOSYOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ, SOSYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
The sociology of generations is one of the relatively new fields of study of sociology and has a developing literature. The problem of generation, which has been overshadowed by different disciplines for a long time, has been studied in macro contexts such as philosophy of history, sociology of time and social change. The most comprehensive theoretical contribution to the problem of generation was made by the German sociologist Karl Mannheim as an original field of study in the sociology of knowledge. Describing generations as social positions formed by the collective consciousness experienced internally in the historical process, Mannheim tried to reveal his theory with historical evidence. However, the empirical analysis of the generational problem has been possible within the framework of the work of other writers who contributed to the sociology of generations after Mannheim. Among these authors, the work of Jane Pilcher provided methodological modifications to Mannheim's reading of historical generations. Pilcher, starting from Mannheim's theory, discussed the possibilities of examining generations empirically, and in this respect, she brought important initiatives to make the sociology of generations a grounded field of study. In this study, Mannheim's sociology of generations is discussed within the framework of Pilcher's innovations. With this aim, first of all, the main lines of Mannheim's theory will be revealed, then the works of authors who contributed to the sociology of generations after Mannheim will be mentioned. Finally, Pilcher's contributions to the sociology of generations will be discussed within the framework of the methodological concept of social generation.
Reference25 articles.
1. Adam, B. (1980). Time And Social Theory, Cambridge & Oxford: Polity.
Aron, R. (1964). German Sociology. (M. Bottomore & T. Bottomore, Trans.), New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
2. Bergmann, W. (1992). The Problem of Time In Sociology: An Overview of The Literature on The State of Theory And Research on The “Sociology of Time”, 1900-82, Time & Society, 1(1), 81-134, Doi: 10.1177/0961463X92001001007
3. Bloom, A. (1986). The New York Intellectuals & Their World, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bontekoning, A. (2017). The Power of Generations: How To Keep Aging Organizations Up To Date The Dutch Case, Amsterdam: Warden.
5. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (2014). Düşünümsel Bir Antropoloji İçin Cevaplar, N. Ökten (Çev.), İstanbul: İletişim..