SOCIAL GENERATIONS: A METHODOLOGICAL EXPANSION IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF GENERATIONS

Author:

ÇAKIR Halil1,AZMAN Ayşe2

Affiliation:

1. HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, REYHANLI SOSYAL BİLİMLER MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU

2. MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, SOSYOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ, SOSYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALI

Abstract

The sociology of generations is one of the relatively new fields of study of sociology and has a developing literature. The problem of generation, which has been overshadowed by different disciplines for a long time, has been studied in macro contexts such as philosophy of history, sociology of time and social change. The most comprehensive theoretical contribution to the problem of generation was made by the German sociologist Karl Mannheim as an original field of study in the sociology of knowledge. Describing generations as social positions formed by the collective consciousness experienced internally in the historical process, Mannheim tried to reveal his theory with historical evidence. However, the empirical analysis of the generational problem has been possible within the framework of the work of other writers who contributed to the sociology of generations after Mannheim. Among these authors, the work of Jane Pilcher provided methodological modifications to Mannheim's reading of historical generations. Pilcher, starting from Mannheim's theory, discussed the possibilities of examining generations empirically, and in this respect, she brought important initiatives to make the sociology of generations a grounded field of study. In this study, Mannheim's sociology of generations is discussed within the framework of Pilcher's innovations. With this aim, first of all, the main lines of Mannheim's theory will be revealed, then the works of authors who contributed to the sociology of generations after Mannheim will be mentioned. Finally, Pilcher's contributions to the sociology of generations will be discussed within the framework of the methodological concept of social generation.

Publisher

Imgelem (Imagination)

Reference25 articles.

1. Adam, B. (1980). Time And Social Theory, Cambridge & Oxford: Polity. Aron, R. (1964). German Sociology. (M. Bottomore & T. Bottomore, Trans.), New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

2. Bergmann, W. (1992). The Problem of Time In Sociology: An Overview of The Literature on The State of Theory And Research on The “Sociology of Time”, 1900-82, Time & Society, 1(1), 81-134, Doi: 10.1177/0961463X92001001007

3. Bloom, A. (1986). The New York Intellectuals & Their World, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Bontekoning, A. (2017). The Power of Generations: How To Keep Aging Organizations Up To Date The Dutch Case, Amsterdam: Warden.

5. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (2014). Düşünümsel Bir Antropoloji İçin Cevaplar, N. Ökten (Çev.), İstanbul: İletişim..

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3