Author:
Khazaei Mehdi,Hoseini Mehri,Khalili Marziyeh, , ,
Reference15 articles.
1. Vahdatnejad J, Abbasinia M, Hoseinpoor S, Babaii A. The comparison between two methods of endotracheal tube suctioning with negative pressure of 100 and 200 mmHg. IJNR. 2014; 9 (3):68-75.
2. Bruschettini M, Zappettini S, Moja L, Grazia Calevo M. Frequency of endotracheal suctioning for the prevention of respiratory morbidity in ventilated newborns. 2016;7(3):
3. Alizadeh, Z, Paymard, A, Khalili, A, Hejr, H. A systematic review of pain assessment method in children. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2017:10(4): 847-849.
4. Paymard A, Khalili A, Zoladl M, Zareei Z, Javadi M. Comparison of Pulse and Arterial Oxygen Saturation Changes in Endotracheal Suction Opening with Two Sizes of 12 and 14: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Sci J Hamadan Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2017; 25 (2) :1-7.
5. Taheri P, Asgari N, Golchin M. The effect of open and closed endotracheal tube suctioning system on respiratory parameters of infants undergoing mechanical ventilation. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012; 17(1): 26–29.