Author:
Westrick Edward R.,Bernstein Mitchell,Little Milton T.,Marecek Geoffrey S.,Scolaro John A.
Abstract
Multiple successful strategies exist for the management of critical-sized bone defects. Depending on the location and etiology of an osseous defect, there are nuances that must be considered by the treating surgeon. The induced membrane technique and various modifications of the Ilizarov method (bone transport by distraction osteogenesis) have been the most common methods for biologic reconstruction. Despite the versatility and high union rates reported, they may not be practical for every patient. The rapid expansion of three-dimensional printing of medical devices has led to an increase in their use within orthopaedic surgery, specifically in the definitive treatment of critical bone defects. This article proposes indications and contraindications for implementation of this technology and reviews the available clinical evidence on the use of custom nonresorbable implants for the treatment of traumatic bone loss. Clinical cases are presented to illustrate the scenarios in which this approach is viable.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference19 articles.
1. Management of critical bone defects;Marecek;Instr Course Lect,2020
2. Reconstructive options for tibial bone defects;McClure;J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2021
3. 3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics;Wong;Orthop Res Rev,2016
4. 3D printing and its applications in orthopaedic trauma: A technological marvel;Lal;J Clin Orthop Trauma,2018
5. Bone repair using the masquelet technique;Masquelet;J Bone Joint Surg Am,2019
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献