Affiliation:
1. ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCES
2. University of Queensland
Abstract
Independent regulatory authorities are expected to act as apolitical agents to prevent market failures in the sector they regulate. However, according to political signal theory, regulatory authorities cannot escape the interventions and control of the political power. In addition, according to capture theory, regulation is designed and operated for the benefit of dominant capital groups in the sector. This article applies both theories to the case of Türkiye’s radio and TV sector. Based on our analysis we claim that the Turkish Radio and Television Supreme Council is a unique case of a supposedly independent authority being captured by both the political power and dominant capitalist groups in the sector, which are intertwined with this power, by limiting its administrative and financial autonomy. Our findings show that the close relations between capital groups and important political figures, which have been clear since the the sector was first liberalized, have helped these groups gain a privileged position in Türkiye’s media sector. As a result, the main instrument that changed the media ownership structure was the interventions of the political power in line with the propositions of the "political signaling" theory.
Reference71 articles.
1. Adaklı, G. (2010). Neoliberalizm ve Medya: Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Medya Endüstrisinin Dönüşümü [Neoliberalism and Media: The Transformation of Media Industries in The World and Turkey]. Mülkiye, 34(269), 67-84.
2. Adaklı, G. (2014). Medya Sermayesi ve Ultra-Çapraz Bütünleşmeler.[ Media capital and ultracross media ownership] Perspectives: Siyasi Analiz ve Yorum içinde (18-23), Heinrich Böll Stiftung(8).
3. Ayan, V. M. (2019). AKP Devrinde Medya Âlemi. [Media World in the AKP Era] Yordam Kitap.
4. Baykal, K. C., & Coşkun, S. (2018). Türkiye'de radyo ve televizyon yayıncılığında reklam yayınlarını düzenleyen ilkelerin ihlâli. [The Violations of the Regulations of Advertisement Codes in Turkey] Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(10), 127-144.
5. Bernstein, M. H. (1955). Independence, Responsibility, and the Public Interest. In Regulating Business by Independent Commission (pp. 126-163). Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt183pzkt.9