Affiliation:
1. Kuban State Medical University
Abstract
Aim.To evaluate and analyse features of abdominal delivery in maternal care institutions (level III) in Krasnodar Krai on the basis of M.S. Robson’ obstetric care criteria (2001) and indicators of cesarean section efficacy.Materials and methods.A retrospective study of archives from two Krasnodar Krai obstetric institutions (level III) (the perinatal centres of the Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital and the Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2) was carried out. The material for analysis was the number of births, surgery activity and perinatal mortality indicators (2017).Results.A comparative analysis of abdominal delivery in two leading perinatal centres of the Region revealed low levels of cesarean section efficacy. The monitoring of obstetric conditions, which had the greatest influence on the growth of abdominal delivery cases, was carried out using M.S. Robson’ system. It was revealed that the largest increase in abdominal delivery was observed in patients included in groups I and V.Conclusion.Despite the fact that the efficacy of abdominal delivery in Krasnodar Krai maternal care institutions (level III) is low, a detailed individualised analysis of indications for the performed surgical labour revealed obstetric practices (uterine scars, fetal distress, anomalies in labour), which increased the level of surgical activity. However, taking into account the specificity of indications for hospitalisation of patients in these medical institutions (severe extragenital pathology, complicated pregnancy), an increase in operative activity and low effectiveness of cesarean section are justified.
Publisher
Kuban State Medical University
Reference15 articles.
1. Gur’ev D.L., Trokhanova O.V., Gur’eva M.S., Abdullaeva Kh.G., Kabanov I.V., Gur’eva D.D. Applying of robson classification for the analysis of the work obstetary hospital 3 level and searching for ways to reduce frequency of the caesarean section. Mat’ i Ditya v Kuzbasse. 2018; 4(75): 70–74 (In Russ., English abstract).
2. Tanaka K., Mahomed K. The Ten‑Group Robson Classification: A single centre approach identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. Volume 2017. Article ID 5648938. 5 pages. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5648938
3. Souter V., Jodie K., Chien A. The Robson classification: monitoring and comparing cesarean delivery rates. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 127: 131S. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000483531.18218.6d
4. Miroshnikov A.E., Zharkin N.A. Obstetric audit based on Robson ten-group classification system. V.F. Snegirev Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Journal. 2018; 1(5): 45–48 (In Russ., English abstract). DOI: 10.18821/2313-8726-2018-5-1-45-48
5. Serikbolova D.E., Kaipova A.S., Akylzhanova Zh.E., Dernova T.M, Shalbaeva O.I. Use of Robson classification for analysis the work of municipal state enterprise on the right of economic management “Pavlodar regional perinatal center № 1” and finding ways to reduce the frequency of surgical intervention. Nauka i Zdravookhranenie. 2019; 21(3): 135–141 (In Russ., English abstract).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献