Logistic regression model for predicting failure of dual antihypertensive therapy: a prospective comparative non-randomized clinical trial

Author:

Okorokova T. O.1ORCID,Kryuchkova O. N.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. N.I. Pirogov Kerch Hospital No. 1

2. Georgievsky Medical Academy of Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

Abstract

Background. Initial dual antihypertensive therapy is currently considered as the first management step for the majority of patients with arterial hypertension. However, it often fails to achieve the target blood pressure levels. An approved algorithm for predicting the failure of dual antihypertensive therapy is still to be developed. Objectives. To establish predictors of dual antihypertensive therapy failure in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk and to create a model for predicting negative outcome of dual antihypertensive therapy. Methods. The paper presents a prospective comparative non-randomized clinical trial. The recruiting of participants and recording of results were carried out in March–December 2019 with 3 months of the follow-up period. The trial involved examination of 88 patients with poor blood pressure control, stage II and III arterial hypertension, high and very high cardiovascular risk of stages 1–3. Clinical and laboratory examination was carried out in compliance with the current regulatory documents. Additional examination included tests for uric acid, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, as well as respiratory polygraphy and computerized capillaroscopy. All patients were prescribed dual antihypertensive therapy. The primary search for predictors was performed using the binary logistic regression. The predictive model was developed by stepwise variable selection. The diagnostic significance of the binary classifier was assessed by means of ROC-curve analysis; the calculation was performed using MedCalc 20.218 software (MedCalc Software Ltd., Belgium). Results. Administration of two hypotensive drugs appears to be effective in 33% of patients. The final model for predicting negative outcomes of dual antihypertensive therapy included such independent predictors as interventricular septal thickness, daily mean systolic blood pressure, and area density of the capillary network. The odds ratio accounted for 9.1 (95% confidence interval 3.12; 26.82). The area under the ROC curve based on the multiple binary logistic regression model comprised 0.805±0.05 with 95% confidence interval: 0.707-0.882 (p<0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of the method amounted to 83.1 and 69.0%, respectively. The prediction accuracy comprised 77.3%. Conclusion. The development of patient-oriented algorithms for selection of hypotensive treatment is considered to be essential due to poor blood pressure control during dual antihypertensive therapy. The developed prognostic model may be applied when managing hypertension.

Publisher

Kuban State Medical University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Kobalava ZD, Konradi AO, Nedogoda SV, Shlyakhto EV, Arutyunov GP, Baranova EI, Barbarash OL, Boitsov SA, Vavilova TV, Villevalde SV, Galyavich AS, Glezer MG, Grineva EN, Grinstein YuI, Drapkina OM, Zhernakova YuV, Zvartau NE, Kislyak OA, Koziolova NA, Kosmacheva ED, Kotovskaya YuV, Libis RA, Lopatin YuM, Nebiridze DV, Nedoshivin AO, Ostroumova OD, Oschepkova EV, Ratova LG, Skibitsky VV, Tkacheva ON, Chazova IE, Chesnikova AI, Chumakova GA, Shalnova SA, Shestakova MV, Yakushin SS, Yanishevsky SN. Arterial hypertension in adults Clinical guidelines 2020 Russian Journal of Cardiology 2020;25(3):3786 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/1015829/15604071-2020-3-3786

2. Caraballo C, Desai NR, Mulder H, Alhanti B, Wilson FP, Fiuzat M, Felker GM, Piña IL, O’Connor CM, Lindenfeld J, Januzzi JL, Cohen LS, Ahmad T. Clinical Implications of the New York Heart Association Classification. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(23):e014240. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014240

3. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2019;72(2):160. https://doi.org/101016/jrec201812004

4. Böhm M, Schumacher H, Teo KK, Lonn EM, Mahfoud F, Mann JFE, Mancia G, Redon J, Schmieder RE, Sliwa K, Weber MA, Williams B, Yusuf S. Achieved blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials. Lancet 2017;389(10085):2226–2237. https://doi.org/101016/S01406736(17)30754-7

5. Whelton PK, Flack JM, Jennings G, Schutte A, Wang J, Touyz RM. Editors’ Commentary on the 2023 ESH Management of Arterial Hypertension Guidelines. Hypertension. 2023;80(9):1795–1799. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21592

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3