Author:
Putra Danang Insita,Matsuyuki Mihoko, ,
Abstract
A consensus has emerged that decentralization of the disaster management sector improves disaster risk governance effectiveness and responsiveness. While many researchers contend that decentralization creates institutional capacity building and disaster management regulation opportunities, few studies have measured or analyzed both decentralization and disaster management. We examined changes to the disaster management system and the opportunities and challenges arising following decentralization, as well as how vertical and horizontal relationships between government actors have changed in Indonesia. First, we found that decentralization had a positive effect on the implementation of disaster management with respect to regulation, institutional establishment, budgeting, and planning. Second, despite general improvements, challenges remain, including regulatory inconsistencies, a lack of funding and capacity for local institutional establishments, a lack of participation of experts, a strong dependence on the central government, and an increased corruption rate. Third, while a decentralized disaster management system framework has been established, the local government’s capacity and the overall network remain limited, with national institutions playing a leading role. These findings suggest that empowering the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) and strengthening the vertical and horizontal provincial/municipal networks of the BPBD would both enhance the disaster management system and allow local actors to play a more critical role in disaster management.
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Engineering (miscellaneous),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference48 articles.
1. Y. Bae, Y.-M. Joo, and S.-Y. Won, “Decentralization and collaborative disaster governance: Evidence from South Korea,” Habitat Int., Vol.52, pp. 1-7, doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.027, 2015.
2. K. Baba and M. Tanaka, “Challenges of implementing climate change adaptation policy for disaster risk reduction – implications from framing gap among stakeholders and the general public –,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.10, No.3, pp. 404-419, 2015.
3. S. Jones, K. Aryal, and A. Collins, “Local-level governance of risk and resilience in Nepal,” Disasters, Vol.37, No.3, pp. 442-467, doi:10.1111/disa.12006, 2013.
4. N. Setiadi, J. Birkmann, and P. Buckle, “Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation: Case Studies from South and Southeast Asia,” Studies of the University: Research, Counsel, Education (SOURCE), No.14, 2010.
5. D. A. Rondinelli, J. R. Nellis, and G. S. Cheema, “Decentralization in developing countries: a review of recent experience,” World Bank Staff Workikng Papers No.581, 1983.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献