Abstract
The author thinks keys to debris flow studies lie in 1) sediment sorting in debris flow body, 2) phase shifting to or from fluid to solid, 3) difference between sediment concentration and flux sediment concentration, 4) constitutive relations and 5) governing equations employed in numerical simulation. In discussing 3)-5), the author stresses that 1) Eq. (1) predicts the spatial average sediment concentration of the flow body well from debris flow to bed load, and thus it should be prized, 2) researchers must be careful for the difference between sediment concentration and flux sediment concentration and for different flow structures over erodible and rigid beds, and realizes that 3) many problems associated with governing equations such as bed shear stress, erosion and deposition rates and correction parameters for sediment transport still remain to be solved.
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Engineering (miscellaneous),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference34 articles.
1. C. L. Chen, “General Solutions for Viscoplastic Debris Flow,” J. of Hydraulic Eng., Vol.114, No.3, pp. 259-282, 1988.
2. S. Egashira, K. Ashida, H. Yajima, and J. Takahama, “Constitutive Equations of Debris Flow, Annuals of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute,” Kyoto Univ., No.32, B-2, pp. 487-501, 1989 (in Japanese).
3. S. Egashira and K. Ashida, “Unified View of the Mechanics of Debris Flow and Bed Load,” Advances inMicromechanics of Granular Materials (Shen H. H. etal. Eds), Elsevier, pp. 391-400, 1992.
4. S. Egashira, “Mechanism of Sediment Erosion and Deposition of Debris Flow,” J. Japan Society of Erosion Control Eng., Vol.46, No.1 (186), pp. 45-49, 1993 (in Japanese).
5. S. Egashira, K. Miyamoto, and T. Itoh, “Bed-Load Rate in View of Two Phase Flow Dynamics,” Annual J. of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, Vol.41, pp. 789-794, 1997a (in Japanese).
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献