Author:
Gao Jingyi,Chen Wei,Murao Osamu, , ,
Abstract
Open data is a practical source for identifying disaster risks. However, few studies have examined open data usage. This study employed CiteSpace to conduct a bibliometric analysis to determine the evolution of open data in the field of disaster risk based on the literature. The findings were as follows: first, the existing disaster-related research can be classified into four categories: introduction to risk management and its concepts, multi-hazard response, studies on the specific background or context, and analysis of the technology or methods used in disaster risk reduction. Second, the relevant literature first emerged in 1997 and has rapidly expanded in recent years. Top keywords were identified, such as “natural disaster,” “risk,” and “climate change.” Third, the most productive country in terms of publications has been the People’s Republic of China; however, the low centrality indicates a lack of international collaborations. Fourth, several bursts were found in the collected literature. The term “data analysis” appears to be one of the most pressing concerns. Finally, we identified the research frontiers. The topic “accessible global dataset” has been of primary interest to researchers recently. The results of this study can provide directional references for future research in the field.
Funder
International Joint Graduate Program in Resilience and Safety Studies
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Engineering (miscellaneous),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference50 articles.
1. World Economic Forum, “The global risks report 2021,” 16th Edition, 2021, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf [accessed May 20, 2021]
2. K. Satake, “Advances in earthquake and tsunami sciences and disaster risk reduction since the 2004 Indian ocean tsunami,” Geosci. Lett., Vol.1, No.1, Article No.15, 2014.
3. X. Li et al., “Measuring county resilience after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., Vol.7, No.4, pp. 393-412, 2016.
4. Y. Zhang, W. Hua, and S. Yuan, “Mapping the scientific research on open data: A Bibliometric review,” Learn. Publ., Vol.31, No.2, pp. 95-106, 2018.
5. G. Shen and S. N. Hwang, “Spatial–temporal snapshots of global natural disaster impacts revealed from EM-DAT for 1900–2015,” Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk, Vol.10, No.1 pp. 912-934, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2018.1552630, 2019.