Author:
Lee Amaly Fong,Saenz Adan Vega, ,
Abstract
Central America and the Caribbean islands are among the regions most exposed to socio-natural threats due to numerous underlying risk factors, such as poverty, inadequate management of natural resources, drug trafficking, illegal immigration, and urban conglomeration, which particularly influence sociocultural factors. This region is also characterized by widespread cultural diversity, sizable indigenous regions, and various ethnic groups, as well as social and cultural characteristics that cannot be compared to each other. Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) teams intervene directly within the environment described above to perform rescue operations for people in situations that entail some damage to the surrounding infrastructure or environment. These teams comprise highly-trained specialists with technical knowledge. However, in some cases, these teams may face disadvantages due to their lack of knowledge regarding the sociocultural components, which would allow them to develop an understanding of human behavior in a broader sense. In the current paper, we provide a detailed examination of the sociocultural factors that significantly impact the success or failure of operations led by USAR teams in the Central American and Caribbean communities. To reduce the high losses caused by disasters in the region and inequity in the missions of these teams, we conclude that increased attention should be directed toward sociocultural components in the work of rescuers.
Funder
Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
CEPREDENAC
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Engineering (miscellaneous),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference37 articles.
1. G. A. Cardona and J. M. Calderon, “Robot Swarm Navigation and Victim Detection Using Rendezvous Consensus in Search and Rescue Operations,” Applied Sciences, Vol.9, No.8, Article No.1702, 2019.
2. S. Appleby-Arnold et al., “Applying Cultural Values to Encourage Disaster Preparedness: Lessons from a Low-Hazard Country,” Int. J. of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol.31, pp. 37-44, 2018.
3. Y. Fukuda, “Three-Dimensional Measurement for Revitalization of Intangible Cultural Properties After Disasters,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.9, pp. 1329-1335, 2019.
4. A. Bonazza et al., “Safeguarding Cultural Heritage from Natural and Man-Made Disasters: A Comparative Analysis of Risk Management in the EU,” European Union, 2018.
5. N. Khoeriyah, W. Warto, and S. Sariyatun, “Exploring the Interpretation of Cultural Values in Babad Banyumas Manuscript as a Means to Understanding Banyumas Society,” Int. J. of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, Vol.5, No.4, pp. 96-107, 2018.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献