Estimation of the Restoration Period of the Water Supply System in Lima, Peru, After a Scenario Earthquake
-
Published:2023-06-01
Issue:4
Volume:18
Page:359-365
-
ISSN:1883-8030
-
Container-title:Journal of Disaster Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Disaster Res.
Author:
Maruyama Yoshihisa1ORCID, Ichimoto Ryo2, Nojima Nobuoto3ORCID, Inocente Italo4ORCID, Gallardo Jorge4ORCID, Quiroz Luis4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Graduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba, Chiba 263-8522, Japan 2. Faculty of Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan 4. Japan-Peru Center for Earthquake Engineering Research and Disaster Mitigation (CISMID), National University of Engineering (UNI), Lima, Peru
Abstract
The restoration period of the water supply system in Lima, Peru, after a scenario earthquake was estimated in this study. To achieve the objective, the probabilistic assessment model for post-earthquake residual capacity of the utility lifeline system initially proposed by Nojima and Sugito (2005) and revised by following related studies was employed. The dataset of water distribution pipelines was provided by Potable Water and Sewer System Service in Lima, Peru (SEDAPAL), and the spatial distribution of ground motion with a moment magnitude of 8.6 was considered as a scenario earthquake in this study. The water disruption was anticipated to continue for approximately one month in certain districts of Lima, Peru. The estimated smallest water supplying ratio was 21.1% in Villa El Salvador after the scenario earthquake.
Funder
Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Engineering (miscellaneous),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Reference18 articles.
1. R. Isoyama, E. Ishida, K. Yune, and T. Shirozu, “Seismic damage estimation procedure for water supply pipelines,” Water Supply, Vol.18, No.3, pp. 63-68, 2000. 2. N. Nojima and Y. Maruyama, “Comparison of functional damage and restoration processes of utility lifelines in the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, Japan with two great earthquake disasters in 1995 and 2011,” JSCE J. of Disaster FactSheets, FS2016-L-0005, 2016. 3. N. Nojima and M. Sugito, “Probabilistic assessment model for post-earthquake serviceability of utility lifelines and its practical application,” G. Augusti, G. I. Schuëller, and M. Ciampoli (Eds.), “Safety and Reliability of Engineering Systems and Structures: Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR’05),” pp. 279-287, Millpress, 2005. 4. N. Nojima and H. Kato, “Modification and validation of an assessment model of post-earthquake lifeline serviceability based on the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.9, No.2, pp. 108-120, 2014. 5. N. Pulido et al., “Estimation of a source model and strong motion simulation for Tacna City, South Peru,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.9, No.6, pp. 925-930, 2014.
|
|