Path Planning Using a Flow of Pedestrian Traffic in an Unknown Environment
-
Published:2023-12-20
Issue:6
Volume:35
Page:1460-1468
-
ISSN:1883-8049
-
Container-title:Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Robot. Mechatron.
Author:
Ishikawa Kiichiro1, Otomo Kei1, Osaki Hayato1, Odaka Taiga1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Fundamental Engineering, Nippon Institute of Technology, 4-1 Gakuendai, Miyashiro-machi, Minamisaitama-gun, Saitama 345-8501, Japan
Abstract
This paper outlines a path planning method for autonomous rovers navigating urban environments without prior mapping, with a particular focus on addressing the Tsukuba Challenge. Our approach utilizes observations of pedestrian and robot movement trajectories to construct path graphs for global path planning. We provide a detailed overview of the autonomous rover’s hardware and software system, as well as a comprehensive description of the path planning algorithm. Our methodology entails extracting and continuously tracking dynamic objects from LiDAR data, resulting in the creation of a path graph based on their observed trajectories. Subsequently, a path aligned with the desired direction is selected. Notably, in indoor experimental settings, our approach proves effective, as the rover successfully generates a path to the goal by closely monitoring and tracking pedestrian movements. In conclusion, this paper introduces a promising path planning methodology and suggests potential areas for further research in autonomous mobility within uncharted environments.
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,General Computer Science
Reference22 articles.
1. Y. Hara, T. Tomizawa, H. Date, Y. Kuroda, and T. Tsubouchi, “Tsukuba Challenge 2019: Task Settings and Experimental Results,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.32, No.6, pp. 1104-1111, 2020. https://doi.org/jrm.2020.p1104 2. S. Yuta, “Tsukuba Challenge: Open Experiments for Autonomous Navigation of Mobile Robots in the City – Activities and Results of the First and Second Stages –,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.30, No.4, pp. 504-512, 2018. https://doi.org/jrm.2018.p0504 3. D. Wettergreen, D. Jonak, D. Kohanbash, S. Moreland, S. Spiker, J. Teza, and W. Whittaker, “Design and Experimentation of a Rover Concept for Lunar Crater Resource Survey,” 47th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-1206 4. P. Visscher and D. Woolley, “Midsize Lunar Rover Development and Testing,” The 12th Int. Symp. on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS 2014), 2014. 5. M. Quigley, B. Gerkey, K. Conley, J. Faust, T. Foote, J. Leibs, E. Berger, R. Wheeler, and A. Ng, “ROS: An open-source Robot Operating System,” ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software, Vol.3, No.2, 2009.
|
|