Author:
Yao Hua,An Suyang,Zhou Huiping,Itoh Makoto, ,
Abstract
The topic of transition from automated driving to manual maneuver in conditionally automated driving (SAE level-3) has acquired increasing interest. In such conditionally automated driving, drivers are expected to take over the vehicle control if the situation goes beyond the system’s functional limit of operation. However, it is challenging for drivers to resume control timely and perform well after being engaged in non-driving related tasks. Facing this challenge, this paper investigated a safety compensation in which the system conducts automatic deceleration to prolong the time budget for drivers to response. The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the effect of safety compensation on takeover performance in different takeover scenarios such as fog, route choosing, and lane closing. In the experiment, 16 participants were recruited. Results showed no significant effect of safety compensation on the takeover time, but a significant effect on the longitudinal driving performance (viz. driver brake input and the time to event). Moreover, it indicated a significant effect of safety compensation on the lateral acceleration in the lane closing scenario. This finding is useful for the automotive manufacturers to supply users a safer transition scheme from automated driving to manual maneuver.
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,General Computer Science
Reference16 articles.
1. S. Tsugawa, “Special Issue on Fundamental Technologies for ITS,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.13, No.4, p. 339, 2001.
2. SAE international, “Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles,” J3016-201806, 2018.
3. C. Coles, “Automated Vehicles: A Guide for Planners and Policymakers,” Master Dissertation of California Polytechnic State University, pp. 1-93, 2016.
4. T. Bellet, M. Cunneen, M. Mullins et al., “From semi to fully autonomous vehicles: New emerging risks and ethico-legal challenges for human-machine interactions,” Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol.63, pp. 153-164, 2019.
5. Y. Forster, F. Naujoks, A. Neukum et al., “Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol.109, pp. 18-28, 2017.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献