Abstract
For a learning system, nothing is more influential than data to be learned. Any data, whether in-sample or out-of-sample, is intrinsically particular. This is typically true for complex market data. Data for the last year on a single stock name, for instance, is only a small segment of data patterns if compared to unseen out-of-sample data having potentially numerous patterns. Any technical system trained with limited in-sample data is more or less particular, thus likely becomes to be overfitted. If in-sample data is particular, its performance for out-of-sample data is expected to be poor, no matter how well the technical system is trained. In other words, a better trained technical system frequently has lower performance for out-of sample data. If not well controlled, training is generally a particularity-seeking process of in-sample data, requiring some mechanism outside of the learning process. Possible solutions may exist in in-sample data selection, learning sophistication, or technical indicator effectiveness. This study is intended to provide a better understanding of technical markets and learning, and suggestions on in-sample data selection. Experiments examine how the selection of in-sample data affects the performance of a target system for out-of-sample data and show technical market and learning phenomena using genetic algorithms (GA).
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Human-Computer Interaction
Reference13 articles.
1. J. Wang and S. Chen, “Evolutionary stock trading decision support system using sliding window,” Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 253-258, 1998
2. S. S. Lam, K. P. Lam and H. S. N., “Genetic fuzzy expert trading system for NASDAQ stock market timing,” in Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming in Computational Finance, Ed. Shu-Heng, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp.197-217, 2002
3. C. Neely, P. Weller and R. Ditmar, “Is technical analysis in the foreign exchange market profitable? -- a genetic programming approach,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.32, No.4, pp. 405-427 (1997)
4. L. A. Becker and M. Seshadri, “GP-evolved technical trading rules can outperform buy and hold,” Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Computer Science Technical Report WPI-CS-TR-03-16, 2003
5. L. A. Becker and M. Seshadri, “Comprehensibility and over-fitting avoidance in genetic programming,” Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Computer Science Technical Report WPI-CS-TR-03-09, 2003