Learning and Technical Market -Effects of In-Sample Data Selection-

Author:

Kurokawa Tomio,

Abstract

For a learning system, nothing is more influential than data to be learned. Any data, whether in-sample or out-of-sample, is intrinsically particular. This is typically true for complex market data. Data for the last year on a single stock name, for instance, is only a small segment of data patterns if compared to unseen out-of-sample data having potentially numerous patterns. Any technical system trained with limited in-sample data is more or less particular, thus likely becomes to be overfitted. If in-sample data is particular, its performance for out-of-sample data is expected to be poor, no matter how well the technical system is trained. In other words, a better trained technical system frequently has lower performance for out-of sample data. If not well controlled, training is generally a particularity-seeking process of in-sample data, requiring some mechanism outside of the learning process. Possible solutions may exist in in-sample data selection, learning sophistication, or technical indicator effectiveness. This study is intended to provide a better understanding of technical markets and learning, and suggestions on in-sample data selection. Experiments examine how the selection of in-sample data affects the performance of a target system for out-of-sample data and show technical market and learning phenomena using genetic algorithms (GA).

Publisher

Fuji Technology Press Ltd.

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Human-Computer Interaction

Reference13 articles.

1. J. Wang and S. Chen, “Evolutionary stock trading decision support system using sliding window,” Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 253-258, 1998

2. S. S. Lam, K. P. Lam and H. S. N., “Genetic fuzzy expert trading system for NASDAQ stock market timing,” in Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming in Computational Finance, Ed. Shu-Heng, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp.197-217, 2002

3. C. Neely, P. Weller and R. Ditmar, “Is technical analysis in the foreign exchange market profitable? -- a genetic programming approach,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.32, No.4, pp. 405-427 (1997)

4. L. A. Becker and M. Seshadri, “GP-evolved technical trading rules can outperform buy and hold,” Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Computer Science Technical Report WPI-CS-TR-03-16, 2003

5. L. A. Becker and M. Seshadri, “Comprehensibility and over-fitting avoidance in genetic programming,” Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Computer Science Technical Report WPI-CS-TR-03-09, 2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3