Comparison of Baselines in Extraction of F-Responses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of Baselines in Extraction of F-Responses

Published:2013-07-20 Issue:4 Volume:17 Page:535-539
ISSN:1883-8014
Container-title:Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics
language:en
Short-container-title:JACIII

Author:

Fukuda Ryoji, ,Honda Aoi,Hachisuka Akiko,Hachisuka Kenji, ,

Abstract

The objective of this study is to eliminate slow responses that displace baselines positively. This is a key component of an automated technique for determining parameters of F-waves in an evoked potential obtained by limb stimulation. We investigate five methods and compare them to F-wave repeater data through visual observation by experts.

Publisher

Fuji Technology Press Ltd.

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Human-Computer Interaction

Reference4 articles.

1. A. Morris and M. A. Fisher, “The contemporary role of F-wave studies. F-wave studies: Clinical utility,” Muscle & Nerve, Vol.21, No.8, pp. 1098-1101, 1998.

2. D. W. Stashuk, T. J. Joherty, A. Kassam, and W. F. Brown, “Motor unit number estimates based on the automated analysis of Fresponses,” Muscle & Nerve, Vol.17, No.8, pp. 881-890, 1994.

3. M. A. Fisher, “Comparison of automated and manual F-wave latency measurements,” Clinical neurophysiology, Vol.116, No.2, pp. 264-269, 2005.

4. B. H. Tracey, D. Iyer, E. A. Lesser, F. J. Potts, and S. N. Gozani, “Comparison of expert and algorithm agreement in measurement of nerve conduction study parameters,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Vol.5, No.2, pp. 158-163, 2010.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Repeater F‐waves are signs of motor unit pathology in polio survivors;Muscle & Nerve;2015-03-14